October 28, 1859, Hubbardsville, New York1 The Whites’ visit to Hubbardsville, New York, was part of a three-month tour through several Eastern states: August 17-November 21, 1859. See: Ellen G. White, Ms 7, 1859 (Aug. 17 entry); J. W. [James White], “At Home,” Review, Dec. 8, 1859, p. 20.
Letter to Identity: “Brother Rhodes” is characterized in this letter as a minister, specific mention being made of his work in Roosevelt, Lincklaen, and Lorraine, all in New York. This matches accounts found in the Review of the ministry of Samuel W. Rhodes in the 1850s. Further strengthening the identity are the frequent references to his impatience and harshness, a theme that reappears in other letters from Ellen White to S. W. Rhodes. See: Search term “Rhodes” in Words of the Pioneers. On S. W. Rhodes's severity see, for example, Ellen G. White, Ms 1, 1853 (June 2); Ms 6, 1854 (Feb. 19); Lt 16, 1859 (Oct. 28); Lt 5a, 1861 (Apr. 5).
Samuel W. Rhodes.2
Previously unpublished.
Regarding S. W. Rhodes's repeated failure to amend his harshness in handling church affairs. 1EGWLM 741.5
Dear Brother Rhodes:
Duty compels me to write you a few lines. While at Dartmouth, Massachusetts,3 James and Ellen White had visited Dartmouth, Massachusetts, six weeks earlier, on September 17 and 18, 1859. See: J. W. [James White], “Eastern Tour,” Review, Oct. 13, 1859, p. 164.
I was shown, dear brother, the course that has been pursued by yourself, and its influence. I was shown that you could not be right until you undo what you have done. What had been shown in your case was again presented before me.4 Three earlier visions (1853, 1854, 1857) had called Rhodes to account for his impatient, harsh manner, which had caused considerable damage to the young movement despite his undoubted talents as a preacher. Lt 16, 1859, makes it clear that Rhodes was still struggling with his unfortunate temperament. See: Ellen G. White, Ms 1, 1853 (June 2); Ms 6, 1854 (Feb. 19); Lt 8, 1857 (July 19). After the censure and admonishment for Rhodes contained in Ellen White's vision of 1853, Rhodes had made a public confession in the Review of some of his failings without, however, acknowledging that the visions had played any part. It was not until 1861-1862 that Rhodes revealed the full story. Rhodes was not alone in trying to keep Ellen White's reproofs secret and in doing little to implement called-for changes. In 1861 she took the exceptional step of publishing the cases of Rhodes and some others in Testimony for the Church, No. 6. Her rationale: “I dare not commit them [the reproofs] alone to the individuals to be buried up by them, but shall read what the Lord has seen fit to give me, to those of experience in the church, and if the case demands, bring it before the whole church.” See: Ellen G. White, Ms 1, 1853 (June 2); S. W. Rhodes, “Letter from Bro. Rhodes,” Review, Aug. 11, 1853, p. 55; idem, “From Bro. Rhodes,” Review, Jan. 22, 1861, p. 78; idem, “From Bro. Rhodes,” Review, May 6, 1862, p. 182; Ellen G. White, Spiritual Gifts [vol. 2], p. 293; Arthur L. White, Ellen G. White: The Early Years, pp. 434-437.
I can hold my peace no longer. There are things that must be corrected in the church if they are ever brought into the unity of the faith. You have moved from impulse. You have acted out your feelings and talked hard to different ones, reproving sharply, bearing on individuals with much severity, when there was no occasion for it, except your feelings. You feel strong and act strong—go to extremes. 1EGWLM 742.2
I was shown that it would be some time before the churches in this state lived down and come out from all the wrong instruction they have received. At Roosevelt [New York] I saw it was cleaving to them like the leprosy, and they will be plunged into darkness and trial until they take an entirely different course.6 Two years earlier Ellen White had written to Rhodes concerning the negative influence he was exerting on the churches in central New York, including Roosevelt. His contentious temperament had encouraged a spate of church disciplinary trials whereby “the professed people of God have disgraced themselves in the eyes of the world.” See: Ellen G. White, Lt 8, 1857 (July 19).
Your course in dictating to individuals is all wrong. It was no part of your work, telling what this one must do, and that one. It is for you to preach the Word and allow your brethren to have consciences, as well as yourself. You have been too forward to mark out the track for others. I was shown the sad state of things in Lincklaen [New York]. Such a state of things need not have been. Your hard speeches and severe reproofs, your decided, unyielding course, have been the means of placing the cause there in almost a hopeless condition.7 Almost five years earlier Ellen White, commenting on “the state of things in Lincklaen,” noted that “a right influence had not been exerted by Bro. Rhodes,” who “possessed an overbearing spirit … and has often … misjudged individuals.” See: Ellen G. White, Ms 6, 1854 (Feb. 19).
Lorraine [New York] was presented before me. Circumstances have come under your observation and you have made quick decisions, accordingly gave your opinion, and counseled when it would have been much better had you remained silent. Your counsel, and the position you took in the cases of Brother Brigham and his wife [William Henry Brigham and Polly A. Brigham],8 Identity: Out of the dozen or so Brighams mentioned in the Review during the 1850s only “Wm. H.” is explicitly identified as coming from Lorraine, New York, thus corresponding with Ellen White's description. His full name and that of his wife are given in obituaries. See: Search term “Brigham” in Words of the Pioneers; obituary: “Wm. Henry Brigham,” Review, May 29, 1866, p. 207; obituary: “William H. Brigham,” Review, July 10, 1866, p. 47.
Sister Horr9 This person has not been identified.
Dear Brother, your quick, sharp rebukes, your dictating to individuals, and marking out the course they should follow, has been wrong. Independent, thinking minds will not bear it. And God has not laid that work upon you. You could have had a good influence in this state, but you have killed your own influence by sharp talk, if one differed from you, to pass sentence upon him. The church of God will not bear this; they know it is not the spirit in which the gospel should be carried. 1EGWLM 743.4
There may be times when we shall be called upon to deal plainly, to rebuke, to reprove with all longsuffering and doctrine. The doctrine must do this sharp work, not our words, and there must be longsuffering. You must not be impatient and in a great hurry to have one come up exactly where you think he ought to come at once. Leave time for the angels of God to do their work, to move on hearts, to correct wrongs. Let the truth carry on its purifying process. Teach individuals to move from principle, not from feelings or impulse. Allow that others have a conscience as well as you, and let the angels of God convict that conscience, and then the individuals will have an experience that is worth everything to them. 1EGWLM 744.1
Many have depended on you to have an experience for them, because you have told them what they must do, and what they must not do. Everyone must have a living experience of his own, an individual experience. “Let brotherly love continue.” “Be pitiful, be courteous.” Dear brother, it grieves me while I write, but I dare not withhold. You have not acted on what the Lord has shown concerning you. You have not done as you would mark out for others to do in like circumstances. It is your duty to correct the wrong influence you have exerted. You have set the church an example and have noticed little things, and have had many church trials that have proved a curse instead of a blessing. You have not dwelt upon the living principles of our faith but descended to little particulars, and entered into family matters that in no way concerned you. Many that God loved, you have rebuked and reproved in such a manner that they have been driven off and become completely discouraged. Yet God's pitiful eye is over them, and He will yet reach down His arm to receive them. 1EGWLM 744.2
Those who carry the truth must take a thoughtful, steady course, and their everyday life must be marked with kindness, mercy, compassion, and tenderness. It must not be fitful, impulsive, quick, or retaliating. The servants of Jesus Christ must take such a consistent course that their faith will recommend itself to the understanding of good men, and win unbelievers to the truth. 1EGWLM 744.3
Servants of God must manifest great wisdom and judgment in dealing with minds. They must remember there are many minds and many differences, and these minds are to be made as one mind. The great principles of our faith are to be brought to harmonize the different minds and make them of one mind and one judgment, but this work cannot be done at once. The ministers of Christ are to do their work, preach the Word, talk the principles, and the angels of God are moving upon these minds constantly to correct evils and bring them into the one channel. You have been in too great a hurry, and have felt too uneasy, nervous, and easily irritated, and this has had a scattering influence. We should all be coworkers together to have a gathering instead of a scattering influence; gather with the angels of God. 1EGWLM 744.4
Dear Brother, you have not been calm, patient with your brethren. You have not been impartial, but your judgment has often been partial and one-sided. May the Lord help you to purify your soul through obeying the truth. I saw that you have a work to do. Undo what you have done. 1EGWLM 745.1
Don't smother what the Lord has shown in regard to you. There is scarcely an individual that knows that you have ever been reproved.10 See: Note 5 above.