The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 2
English
AbkhazianAfrikaansAkawaioAlbanian (Shqiptare)AltayAmharic (አማርኛ)Arabic (عربى)Armenian (Հայերեն)AssameseAvarAzerbaijani (Azərbaycan)BandungBatakBengali (বাঙ্গালি)Bosnian (Bosanski)Bulgarian (Български)BuluBurmese (မြန်မာနိုင်ငံ)CaribCatalan (Català)CebuanoChewaTshilubaChinese (中文)ChitongaCroatian (Hrvatski)Czech (Čeština)Danish (Dansk)DariDutch (Nederlands)EsperantoEstonian (Eesti Keel)EweFalam FaroeseFarsi (فارسی)FijianFinnish (Suomalainen)French (Français)GaroGeorgian (Ქართული)German (Deutsch)Greek (Ελληνικά)GreenlandicGujarati (ગુજરાતી)GusiiHakhaHausaHebrew (עִברִית)HiligaynonHindi (हिन्दी)HmarHungarian (Magyar)Icelandic (Íslenska)IgboIlocanoIndonesian (Indonesia)Italian (Italiano)Japanese (日本語)KabardianKannada (ಕನ್ನಡ)Kazakh (Қазақ)KhasiKhmer (ខ្មែរ)KikuyuKinandeKinyarwandaKiribatiKirundiKonjo Korean (한국어)KoryakKurdish (Kurdî)Kyrgyz (Кыргызча)LaoLatvian (Latviski)Lithuanian (Lietuvių)LoziLugandaLuhyaLuoMaasaiMacedonian (Македонски)MalagasyMalay (Melayu)Malayalam (മലയാളം)ManipuriMaoriMaraMarathi (मराठी)Mauritian CreoleMizoMongolianMontenegrinNdebeleNepali (नेपाली)NorwegianNyoro (Tooro)OdiaOromoOvamboPampanganPangasinanPapiamentoPashtoPolish (Polskie)Portuguese (Português)Punjabi (ਪੰਜਾਬੀ)RarotonganRomanian (Română)Russian (Русский)RusynSamoan (Samoa)SantaliSerbian (Српски)Serbo-CroatianSgaw KarenShonaSinhala (සිංහල)Slovak (Slovenský)SlovenianSomali SothoSpanish (Español)Swahili (Kiswahili)Swedish (Svenska)TagalogTahitianTaiwaneseTajik (Тоҷикӣ)Tamil (தமிழ்)Telugu (తెలుగు)Thai (ไทย)Tok PisinTonganTswanaTumbukaTurkish (Türkçe)TurkmenTwiUkrainian (Українська)Urdu (اردو)Uzbek (O'zbek)VendaVietnamese (Tiếng Việt)Welsh (Cymraeg)Xhosa (Isixhosa)YorubaZomiZulu
Froom, LeRoy Edwin
Branson, William HenryCampbell, MichaelChristian, Lewis HarrisonDamsteegt, Pieter GerardDick, Everett NewfonEdwardson, ChristianHowell, Warren EugeneMinisterial Association of the General ConferenceNix, James R.Read, Walter EdwinSpalding, Arthur WhitefieldSpicer, William AmbroseRobinson, Dores Eugene
By LeRoy Edwin Froomen
Book code: CFF2
Bibliography
Published by Review and Herald Publishing Association, Washington, D. C.
ISBN:
Citation: Froom, L. E. (1965) The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 2. Review and Herald Publishing Association, Washington, D. C..
Retrieved fromhttp://text.beta.egwwritings.org/book/b955
1344 Pages
enThe Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 2
- Contents- Table of Contents
- Charts and Tabulations
- From Author to Reader
-
-
- I. Jerusalem Patriarch Sophronius Asserts Immortality a Gift
- II. Arabian Philosopher Averroes Projects Crisis
- III. Greek Bishop Nicholas—Immortality Is Gift of God
- IV. Leading Medieval Rabbis Maintain Final Extinction of Wicked
- V. Witness of the Medieval Waldenses of Piedmont
- VI. Purgatory Errors Stem From Paganism, Not Scripture
- VII. John XXII Digresses From Catholic Disposition of Soul at Death
-
-
-
- I. Revival of Conditionalism Gradually Gathers Momentum
- II. Luther Revives Conditionalism at Outset of Reformation
- III. The Torments of Hell and the Pains of Purgatory
- IV. Dramatic Break With the Might of Rome
- V. “Immortal Soul” Concept Derived From “Roman Dunghill of Decretals”
- VI. Counters Purgatory With Unconscious Sleep of Soul
- VII. Anabaptists Often Involved in Conflict Over “Soul” in Death
- VIII. Polish Anabaptists—Eternal Life After Resurrection
- IX. Many Socinians Likewise Hold Conditionalist Positions
-
- I. Clear-cut Stand on the Sleep of the Soul
- II. Frith—Martyrdom for Denial of Consciousness in Purgatory
- III. Twin Causes of Frith’s Death by Fire
- IV. Continuous Ethiopian Witness for Thousand Years
- V. Origin and Witness of Malabar St. Thomas Christians
- VI. Malabar Coast Witness—Dead Rest Until Judgment
-
- I. Calvin—Foremost Protestant Foe of “Soul Sleep” Postulate
- II. Servetus—Conditionalism Included Among His “Heresies”
- III. Historical Setting of Calvin’s Psychopannychia
- IV. Hurls Invectives Against Anabaptist Soul Sleepers
- V. The Gist of Calvin’s Attack on Soul Sleep
- VI. Eternal Torment Not Established Dogma of Anglican Church
- VII. “Mystic” Renato—Soul Sleeps Unconsciously Until Resurrection
-
- I. Terwoort and Pieters Burned for Faith Under Queen Elizabeth
- II. Conditionalists Legatt and Wightman Burned at Stake Under James I
- III. 20,000 Baptists Declare “Faith” in Confession of 1660
- IV. Signatory Caffyn—Immortality Held in “Promise,” Not Present Possession
- V. Unitarian John Biddle—Persecuted for Conditionalist Beliefs
- VI. Immortality for Saints; Utter Destruction for Sinners
-
-
-
- I. Stegmann of Germany—Dead Restored to Life Through Resurrection
- II. Cumulative Argument on Unconscious State of Dead
- III. Puritan Nathaniel Homes Stresses Resurrection
- IV. Baptist Richardson Opposes Eternal Torment Dogma
- V. Professor Isaac Barrow—Temporal Offenders Not Punished Eternally
- VI. Philosopher John Locke—Bold Stand Against Innate Immortality
- VII. Terse Excerpts From Locke’s Arguments
- VIII. Archbishop Tillotson Undercuts Dogma of Eternal Torment
- IX. Physician William Coward Denies Separate Entity of Soul
- X. Rejects Immortal-Soulism Because of Pagan Origin
- XI. Lawyer Layton Produces Succession of Conditionalist Treatises
- XII. Scope of Writing Revealed by Twelve Titles
- XIII. Witnesses Span Centuries; Opponents Invoke Same Arguments
-
- I. Blackburne—Historian of Reformation Conflict Over Soul Question
- II. Blackburne’s Personal Views on Conditionalism
- III. Four Basic Charges Made by Blackburne
- IV. Scientist Priestley—Total Insensibility Characterizes Death
- V. Priestley on the Condition of Man in Death
- VI. Two Illustrious Questioners of Eternal-Torment Thesis
- VII. Restorationism Revived as “Universalism” in Post Reformation
-
- I. Baptist Professor Whiston—Holds to Complete Destruction of the Wicked
- II. Nonconformist Hallett: If “No Resurrection, No Future State”
- III. “Anonymous”—Consciousness Utterly Ceases in Death
- IV. Physician Scott—Complete Destruction Awaits the Wicked
- V. Bishop Law—Entrance Upon Immortality Only Through Resurrection
- VI. Cambridge Master Peckard—Man Mortal; Immortality Solely Through Christ
- VII. Dissenter Bourn—Punishment of Wicked to Be “Total Extinction”
- VIII. Lesser Lights Support Testimony of Major Witnesses
- IX. “Fringe” Writers Complicate the Controversy
-
-
-
- I. Unprecedented Developments Characterize the New Decades
- II. Reaction to French Revolution Violence Impels Fresh Bible Study
- III. Historical Setting for Nineteenth-Century Impetus
- IV. Little-known Conditionalists Open Witness of Century
- V. Congregation Splits Over Immortality and Resurrection Issues
- VI. Wesleyan Watson—Lost Title to Immortality Regained Through Christ
- VII. Baptist Hall—Eternal Torment Not Essential Article of Faith
- VIII. Bishop Hampden—Brands “Innatism” as Remnant of Scholasticism
- IX. Taylor—Predicts Unfettered Interpretation of Punishment Will Come
- X. Archbishop Whately Expressly Rejects Immortal-Soulist Positions
-
- I. Tremendous Shift From Theocratic Puritanism to Advent Expectancy
- II. Revulsion Against Calvinist Extremism Led to Universalism
- III. Edwards—Supreme Exponent of Never-ending Torment
- IV. Hopkins—Agonies of Damned Add to joys of Saved
- V. Upsurge of Universalism in Colonial and Early National America
- VI. Significance and Result of the Battle of Pens
-
-
- I. “Deacon” Grew—Brings Conditionalism to George Storrs
- II. Essence of Grew’s “Intermediate State” Tract
- III. Gist of “Future Punishment, Not Eternal Life in Misery” Tract
- IV. Storrs—Introduces Conditionalism Into Second Advent Movement
- V. Digest of Storrs’s Famous “Six Sermons”
- VI. Fitch—Storrs’s First Ministerial Convert to Conditionalism
- VII. French—Death an Unconscious State Until Resurrection
-
- I. Mid-century Begins Attainment of New Stature and Standing
- II. Foster—Renounced Dogma of Eternal Torment of Wicked
- III. Dobney—Explicitly Maintains Conditionalist Position
- IV. Edward White—Pre-eminent Champion of Conditionalism
- V. Presents Positive Conditionalism to World Successfully
- VI. Dunn—Doctrine of Eternal Torment Not in Scripture
-
-
- I. Bishop Perowne—Scholarly Advocate of Conditionalism
- II. Thom—Innate Immortality Inference “Falls to the Ground”
- III. Tinling—“Promise of Life” Through Christ Alone
- IV. Tomlinson—Takes Issue With Bishop of Liverpool
- V. Canon Row—Powerful Strokes Against Eternal-Tormentism
- VI. Canon Aitken—Champions Conditionalism for Quarter Century
-
- I. Bishop Courtenay—Wicked End in “Total Cessation of Being”
- II. Leask—Editor of Conditionalist Journal The Rainbow
- III. Maude—Epochal Rainbow Article Creates Crisis
- IV. Minton—Helps Lift “Life in Christ” From Obscurity
- V. Dale—Conditionalism Makes Christian Fundamentals Invulnerable
- VI. Anglican Test Case of Wilson v. Fendall Decided in 1864
- VII. Darby—“Immortality of Soul” Comes From Platonism
- VIII. Christadelphians—Likewise Adhere to Main Conditionalist Positions
-
- I. Dean Farrar—Dramatically Repudiates “Dogma of Eternal Torment”
- II. Farrar’s Written Record of His Tremendous Researches
- III. Missionary Impey—Resignation From Methodist Ministry
- IV. Strang—Virile Conditionalist Editor and Scottish Polemicist
- V. Thorough Investigation Leads to Strong Personal Convictions
- VI. Laing—Effective Scottish Advocate of Conditionalism
- VII. Ham—Bible Excludes Notion of Independent Immortality
-
- I. Bible Echo—Panoramic Portrayal of Conditionalist Advances
- II. Homiletic Monthly’s “Clerical Symposium on Immortality”
- III. Active Discussion in Leading Periodicals in 1878-1879
- IV. Denniston—Jamaican Frontier Conditionalist
- V. Binney—In Maturity Repudiates Eternal Torment Thesis
- VI. Westcott—Innate Immortality “Wholly Insufficient”
- VII. Rotherham—Immortality Is “Contingent and Dependent”
-
-
- I. Moncrieff-Scottish-Canadian Voice Champions Conditionalism
- II. Blain-Devastating Blow Against Eternal-Torment Innovation
- III. Hudson-Lifts Conditionalism to Scholarly Level of Discussion
- IV. Produces the American Conditionalist Classic
- V. Abbot-Creator of Indispensable Aid for Evaluating Conditionalism
- VI. Physician Ives-Man Mortal; Dead Asleep; Wicked Destroyed
- VII. Additional Features in Enlarged American Edition
-
- I. Pettingell-Major American Writer on Conditionalism in 1880’s
- II. Able Coverage of Historical, Philosophical, and Biblical Evidence
- III. Life Everlasting Appends “Symposium” With Twenty-one Participants
- IV. Henry Ward Beecher-Finally Repudiates Dogma of Eternal Torment
- V. Lyman Abbott-Denies Innate Immortality and Eternal Torment
- VI. Harriet Beecher Stowe-Famous Author in Revolt
- VII. Agnostic Ingersoll-Embittered by Eternal Torment Dogma
-
- I. Hendrickson-Truth of “Life in Christ” Unlocks “Hidden Mystery”
- II. Professor Butler-Cloud Rolled Away From Face of God
- III. Professor Bacon-Immortality “Conditional Upon the Act of God”
- IV. Wilson-Eternal Life Only for Those “In Christ”
- V. Hart-Goes to Very Heart of Provision of Immortality
- VI. Independent Kramer-Immortality Only for Believers in Christ
- VIl. Bishop Mann-Brilliant Midwest Champion of Conditionalism
- VIII. Baker—Man Not Inherently Immortal; Wicked Will Perish
-
-
- I. High Scholastic Caliber of Representative Conditionalists
- II. Oliphant-Publicly Professes Conditionalism at Installation
- III. Episcopal Bishop Hopkins-Denies Eternal Torment Contention
- IV. Parkhurst-Seeks Insurance Against Eventual Obliteration
- V. Moomaw-Life Only in Christ; Total Destruction Without
- VI. Edward Beecher-Scholarly Repudiator of Eternal Torment
- VII. Conditionalism Makes Increasing Friends Among Clergy
-
- I. Oshausen-Immortality of Soul Theory Unknown to Scripture
- II. Nitzsch-Have Only Contingent Immortality; May Cease
- III. Schultz-Immortality Contingent; Destruction to Be Total
- IV. High Lights of Dr. Schultz’s “Immortality” Treatise of 1861
- V. Rothe-Suffering Ends in Extinction of the Wicked
- VI. Dorner—Destructionist Theory Gaining in Approval
- VII. Other German Scholars Support Conditionalist View
- VIII. Vinet—“I Do Not Believe in the Immortality of the Soul”
- IX. Secréatan—Rejects Both Eternal Torment and Universalism
- X. Sabatier-Not All Are Immortal; Some Head for Dissolution
- XI. Philosopher De May-Soul Only Conditionally Immortal; Can Perish
-
-
-
- I. Two World Movements-Neither Complete in Itself
- II. Relationships of the Two Major Adventist Bodies
- III. World in Ferment in Mid-century Decades
- IV. Hastings-Virile American Exponent of Conditionalism
- V. Grant-Conditionalist Debator, Editor, and Evangelist
- VI. Taylor—Thumbnail History of Rejecters of Innate Immortality
- VII. Whitmore-Writes in Standard Conditionalist Pattern
- VIII. Wellcome-Publisher of Conditionalist Literature
- IX. Piper—Popular Historical Sketch of Conditionalism’s Vicissitudes
- X. Himes—In Later Life Espouses Conditionalism
- XI. Nonevangelical “Jehovah’s Witnesses” Also Adopt Conditionalism
-
- I. Underlying Reasons for Adventist Conditionalist Belief
- II. Progressive Development of Fundamental Beliefs
- III. James White-Organizational Leader Committed to Conditionalism
- IV. Bates—With Conditionalist Background Supports Position
- V. Ellen Harmon-Accepts Conditionalist View in 1843
- VI. Andrews-Scholarly Writings Include Conditionalism
- VII. Canright-Able Compiler of Scholarly Findings
- VIII. Smith-Presents Case for Conditionalism for Seventh-day Adventists
- IX. Examines Biblical Evidence for Conditionalism
-
-
- I. “Conflict of Ages” Series Sets Forth Conditionalist Position
- II. Innate Immortality Concept Rests on “Authority of Satan”
- III. Immortality Received at Resurrection After Sleep of Death
- IV. Basic Fallacy of Immortal-Soul Presumption
- V. Full Justification for Sinner’s Ultimate Extinction
- VI. Three Problem Passages Clearly Expounded
- VII. Spiritualism the Consummation of the Lie of Eden
- VIII. Inner Philosophy Based on Principle of Desire for Deification
- IX. Materialization of “Spirits” Is Deceptive Device
-
-
-
- I. Comprehensive Over-all View of Current Living Witnesses
- II. Archbishop Temple Presents the Case for Conditionalism
- III. Danish Beck and Teisen-Champions of Conditionalism
- IV. Swedish Cleric Ekman-“Unquenchable Fire” Totally Consumes
- V. Dean Bennett-Willfully Wicked to Be Completely Destroyed
- VI. Cambridge’s Dodd-No Innate Immortality in Bible
- VII. St. Paul’s Dean Matthews-Favors Conditional Immortality
- VIII. Translator Moffatt-Challenges Eternal Torment; Commends Conditionalism
-
-
- I. Bishop Nygren-Scholarly Portrayal of “Innatism” v. Conditionalism
- II. Bristol’s Findlay-Conditionalism Both “Reasonable and Consistent”
- III. Boston’s Knudson-Growing Rejection of Eternal Torment Theory
- IV. Swedish Bishop Resurrection Life, Not Discarnate Existence
- V. Edinburgh’s Baillie-Admits “Conditionalism May Be Right”
- VI. Scotland’s Stewart-Pauline Truth v. Greek and Jewish Errors
- VII. Bible College Forbes-No “Infinite Torture for Finite Sin”
- VIII. Bowman American Tract-Arrays Plato Against Paul
- IX. Oxford’s Quick-Man Wholly Dies Before Totally Living
- X. Swedish Bishop Soul Is “as Mortal” as Body
-
- I. Archdeacon Guillebaud-Ultimate Extinction for Wicked
- II. Guillebaud’s Summary of Conclusions
- III. Mansfield’s Micklem-Innate Immortality Is Greek, Not Biblical
- IV. Anglican Commission-“Eternal Life” Only for “Believers in Christ”
- V. Sweden’s Kahnlund-Creative Resurrection Bestows Immortality
- VI. Schoolmaster Cundy-Resurrection, Not Survival of Separated Souls
- VII. Wesley’s Snaith—Innate Immortality Not “Biblical Idea”
- VIII. Birmingham’s Major—Fire Unextinguishable Consumes Its Victims
-
- I. Gronigen’s Leeuw Soul Ceases to Exist Until Resurrection
- II. Edinburgh’s Taylor-Second Death Is “Suicide” Death
- III. Beasley-Murray-Survival of Soul Only Would Be Fragmentary
- IV. Welsh Dean North-Body Necessary for Resurrected Personality
- V. Free Church’s Vine-Man Not Immortal, but “Immortizable”
- VI. Swedish Bishop Auleén-Immortality Divine “Gift,” Not “Human Prerogative”
- VII. Lutheran’s Heinecken-Man Has No Inherent Immortality
- VIII. Union’s Niebuhr-Sole Hope of Survival Lies in Resurrection
- IX. Harvard’s Dean Sperry-Sinners Vanish Into Eternal “Nothingness”
-
- I. Rector Simcox-Not a “Guess” About the “Grand Perhaps”
- II. Princeton’s Ramsey-Immortality Derivative, Not Inherent
- III. Dean Vidler-“Inherent” Immortality Not Biblical Doctrine
- IV. Caird of McGill-Resurrection Restores “Whole Personality”
- V. Woolwich’s Bishop Robinson-Fundamental Fallacies of Immortal-Soulism
- VI. Augustana’s Wahlstrom-“Resurrection” Only Hope of Future Life
- VII. Hartford’s Spinka-Rejects “Damned to Eternal Torments”
- VIII. Pike and Pittenger-Not “Indestructible” Nature, but Resurrection
- IX. Temple’s Taylor—Denies Presumptive “Deathlessness” of the Soul
- X. Rector Davies-Immortal-Soulism Not Biblical but Greek
- XI. Edinburgh’s Manson-Resurrection Transforms “Mortal Nature”
- XII. Stockholm’s Bolander-Deliverance Not Through Death, but Resurrection
- XIII. Manchester’s Manson-Man Sleeps in Death
- XIV. Tubingen’s Heim-No Continuance in “Disembodied State”
- XV. Canadian Commentator Short-Not “Inherently Immortal”
-
- I. Queen’s Shaw-Favors Conditionalism; Rejects Eternal Torment
- II. Drew’s Craig-Immortality Not Inherent but “Put On”
- III. Boston’s De Wolf-No Inescapable “Everlasting Torture”
- IV. Archeologist Wright-Eternity Entered by “Resurrection of Body”
- V. Theological Debate in Scandinavia Over “Hell” and “Heaven”
- VI. Lutheran Kantonen-No Inherent Capacity to Overleap Tomb
- VII. Richmond’s Roberts-Immortality a Gift, Not a Possession
- VIII. Atkinson of Cambridge-Man Not Immortal; Punishing Not Eternal
-
- I. Toronto’s Owen-“Greek Dualism” Perverted Christian Theology
- II. Zurich’s Brunner-Sinner Brings “Eternal Destruction” Upon Himself
- III. Aberdeen’s Hunter-Pauline Truth Exposes Platonic Error
- IV. India’s Bishop Newbigin-Resurrection Not Immortality
- V. Disciples’ Robinson-“Bodiless Existence” of Greek Innatism Invalid
- VI. Erlangen’s Stauffer-Dead “Sleep” Under God’s Protective Eye
- VII. Wesleyan’s Spurrier-Rejects Platonic Soul Separation
- VIII. Union’s Brown-Not Greek Innate Immortality but Resurrection
- IX. Switzerland’s Kraemer-Innatism Not Biblical but Greek
- X. Presbyterian Bible Lesson Presents “Immortality Through Christ”
- XI. Hooke of London-Greek Inherent Immortality Not in Bible
- XII. Oral Declaration of Late Keswick Teacher, W. Graham Scroggie
-
- I. Switzerland’s Cullmann-Eminent Champion of Conditionalism
- II. Manchester’s Rowley—Greek Immortal-Soulism a Deception
- III. Edinburgh’s Read-Not Something “Released at Death”
- IV. Catholic Tresmontant-Not Part but “Whole Man” Saved
- V. Dominican Trémel—Not “Natural Immortality”; “Resurrection” After “Sleep”
- VI. Earlham’s Trueblood-Disavows an “Eternal Hell”
- VII. Harvard’s Tillich-“Natural” Immortality Not “Christian Doctrine”
- VIII. Harvard’s Hocking-Not “Immortality” but “Immortability”
- IX. Princeton’s Homrighausen—Questions Independent Persistence of Spirit
- X. Methodist Perry-No “Disembodied Existence” Beyond Death
- XI. Adventists Reiterate Conditionalism in 1957 Statement
- XII. Colgate-Rochester’s Hamilton-Platonic Assurance a “Lie”
- XIII. Drew’s Anderson-Mortality of Man v. Greek ImmortalSoulism
- XIV. Chaplain Irion-“Philosophical” Immortality Contradicts Biblical “Resurrection”
- XV. Marburg’s Bultmann-Man a Unified Organism, Not Dualistic
- XVI. Ceylon’s Niles-Not “Natural Immortality” but “Resurrection”
-
- I. Moravian’s Heller-Immortality Not of Man, but From God
- II. San Francisco’s Gill-“Discarnate” Spirit Idea Not Sanctioned by Bible
- III. Canadian “United Church” Committee Report on “Life and Death”
- IV. Von Allmen and Associates-Conditionalist Terms Defined
- V. St. Aldate’s De Berry-Not Eternal Torment, but “Annihilation”
- VI. Handsworth’s Strawson-Eternal Life a Gift, Not Inherent
-
- I. New College’s Simpson-Man “Immort-able” Not Innately Immortal
- II. Amsterdam’s Korff and Van Niftrik-Innatism Alien to Bible
- III. St. Paul’s Holden-Dead All “Sleep” Till Second Advent
- IV. Baptist Andrews-Hellenic Inroads Neutralize Early “Hope”
- V. Drew’s Michalson-No Immortality Apart From Resurrection
- VI. Swedish-American Princell-Sinner’s Punishment Comes to an End
- VII. British Conditionalist Sceats-Veteran Champion of Conditionalism
- VIII. Three Afrikaans Theologians Voice Conditionalist Positions
-
-
- I. Unique and Valuable Collation by Moses Crouse
- II. National Council’s Swaim-Immortality a “Gift,” Not “Inherent” Endowment
- III. McCormick’s Knight-Innatism Based on Apocrypha Not Bible
- IV. Western’s Cocks—Man Lives Again Only by Resurrection
- V. Catholic Professor-Editor Davis—Innatism “Alien to Christianity”
- VI. Princeton’s Hendry-Reinterprets “Westminster’s” Statements
- VII. Anglican Rector Bateson-Arraigns Traditionalist Fallacies
- VIII. Scientist Schweitzer-Innate Immortality a Greek Derivation
- IX. Conditionalist Kearney-Assembles Brilliant Quota of French Writers
- X. Barth Over Radio Affirms Man Mortal, Not Immortal
- XI. Professor Vaucher-Handbook of Continental Conditionalism
- XII. Japan’s Hatano-Resurrection Is From “Nothingness”
- XIII. Baptist Pastor Hatch Becomes Ardent Conditionalist
-
-
-
-
- I. The Consummation of the Original Lie of Eden
- II. Fox Cottage in Hydesville-Cradle of Modern Spiritualism
- III. Three Stages in Historical Development of Spiritualism
- IV. Organized as World-embracing Religion in 1893
- V. “Definitions” of Spiritualism as “Science, Philosophy and Religion”
- VI. Essence of Spiritualism-Survival and Communication
- VII. World Triumph of Spiritualism Claimed Under Way
- VIII. Fundamental Place Accorded Andrew Jackson Davis
-
- I. “World Federation of Christendom” an Spiritualistic Platform
- II. Claims 1848 Ushered in New Era for Human Race
- III. Typical Service in a Spiritualist “Church”
- IV. Occult Episodes in Booth Tarkington Household
- V. Current “Spiritualist Camp” Inducements
- VI. Strange Life and Tragic End of Fox Sisters
-
-
- I. Rehearses Distinctive Principles of Spiritualism
- II. Continuing Consciousness and Communication
- III. Modern Spiritualism Central in New World Cycle
- IV. Spiritualism Has Eastern Occult Connotations
- V. Spiritualism Equated With Christianity Till Constantine
- VI. Consummating Contention Based on “Revelation 14:6”
-
-
- I. Spiritualism and the Question of Metaphysical Healing
- II. Historical Relationships of Mesmerism, Hypnotism, and Spiritualism
- III. Dr. Davis Writes Under Magnetic-Mesmeric Control
- IV. “Spirit Healings” Flaunt Explicit Biblical Provisos
- V. Invading Citadel of God-given Sacred Individuality
- VI. Hypnosis May Lead to Disastrous Results
- VII. Satan Seeking to Control the Minds of Men
-
- I. Bible Testimony Regarding Satan, Demons, and Occultism
- II. Multiple Terms for Variants of Spiritualism
- III. Impersonating Demon Deceived King Saul at Endor
- IV. Fathers Held Samuel Was Impersonated by Demon
- V. Warnings Parallel the Claims and Actualities of Spiritualism
- VI. Investigators Doubt Claimed Identity of “Spirits”
- VII. Various Catholics Hold Phenomena of Satanic Origin
- VIII. Isaiah’s Futile Appeal to Disobedient Israel
- IX. “Covenant With Death” and “Agreement With Hell”
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Subject Guide