Loading...
Larger font
Smaller font
Copy
Print
Contents

101 Questions - About Ellen White and Her Writings

 - Contents
  • Results
  • Related
  • Featured
No results found for: "".
  • Weighted Relevancy
  • Content Sequence
  • Relevancy
  • Earliest First
  • Latest First

    Question 14: Did Ellen White mistakenly confuse two Herods? (“Seeming Contradictions Between 1SG 71 and 3SP 334”)

    I have seen a supposed mistake by Ellen White that I don’t understand. Someone claims that she mistakenly spoke of two Herods as one. The two statements that are contrasted are Spiritual Gifts, 1:71, and The Spirit of Prophecy, 3:334, the first one being said to be a mistake. Please clarify this for me.101Q 46.1

    Yes, the two statements differ. The latter one is the more accurate in that it does not portray the Herod who killed John the Baptist and presided at the trial of Jesus as the same one who killed James and tried to kill Peter. Some have concluded that Mrs. White changed this matter in her later volume to try to cover up her “error.” But this overlooks the fact that volume 1 of Spiritual Gifts was reproduced completely in Early Writings, which was published in 1882, four years after volume 3 of The Spirit of Prophecy was published—and the original statement can still be found in Early Writings, pages 185, 186. (In later printings, a note has been added that acknowledges the two Herods and offers an explanation—not a very strong one in my opinion.)101Q 46.2

    To me, the source of the confusion is clear—it is Scripture itself that calls them both Herod, and Ellen White was simply following Scripture in this. She wrote later, “I take the Bible just as it is, as the Inspired Word. I believe its utterances in an entire Bible” (Selected Messages, 1:17). I am not troubled by the fact that at this early stage (1858) she did not know every aspect of Bible-related history. (Nor did she know it all later, either.) It seems to me that when she had additional information on this point, she did the responsible thing— she used the better information in her next presentation of this part of the Bible’s story.101Q 46.3

    Those who accuse her on this matter are assuming a view of inspiration in which there can be no human error. Seventh-day Adventists at large do not subscribe to that view. Mrs. White did not claim such a thing for herself. She wrote, “In regard to infallibility, I never claimed it; God alone is infallible. His word is true, and in Him is no variableness, or shadow of turning” (Selected Messages, 37).101Q 46.4