Chapter 5—A Postscript—An Observation On W. W. Prescott’s Use Of The Writings Of Others

W. W. Prescott in his April 26, 1910, letter to W. C. White in which he offered suggestions regarding The Great Controversy, observed in both his first and last suggestions the absence of references, to materials quoted. He says:WWPGC 38.5

There is one general feature of the book to which I will call attention without attempting to refer definitely to each case, as this would require much space, and involve much repetition. Throughout the book there are very many quotations, both from other writers and from verbal conversations which ought to be accurate, and which I think ought to have in nearly all cases suitable references. It is very difficult now, however, to locate these quotations, as oftentimes there is no hint which would enable one to look them up. I shall call attention to some which I have been able to locate, and suggest the need of much work in this direction.WWPGC 38.6

Ten years later, in 1920, the Review and Herald published a 300-page college textbook prepared by W. W. Prescott, titled The Doctrine of Christ. Each lesson is supported by materials drawn in from other authors. Notes taken from the Spirit of Prophecy writings are fully credited. Notes from other authors are in quotation marks, but carry no source references. In his “Introductory Note” Prescott explains:WWPGC 38.7

All quotations in the notes taken from the Spirit of Prophecy are duly credited to book and page. The other quotations have been selected from many sources, but as they are not cited as authority, but are used merely for the expression of the thought, no credit has been given.WWPGC 38.8

There are over 500 notes without credit, but in quotation marks. There is no way of identifying the sources or the authors of the materials thus brought into the Prescott book.WWPGC 38.9

Arthur L. White
Ellen G. White Estate
Washington, D. C.
February 3, 1981