06 “DETERMINED,” Daniel 9:24, MEANS “CUT OFF.”

FIRST WITNESS. “‘Seventy weeks are determined,’ literally, ‘cut off.’ Hebraists all admit that the word determined, in our English version, does signify ‘cut off.’ Not one has disputed it.”—Josiah Litch, Midnight Cry, vol. iv. No. 25.STTHD 58.1

Second witness. “Seventy weeks have been cut off upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sin-offerings, and to make atonement for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the Most Holy.” Daniel 9:24.-Whiting’s Translation.STTHD 58.2

Third witness. Gesenius, the standard Hebrew lexicographer, thus defines this word in his Hebrew lexicon: “Nechtak: Properly, to cut off; tropically, to divide; and so to determine, to decree.”STTHD 58.3

Fourth witness. The Chaldeo-Rabbinic Dictionary of Stockius, defines the word nechtak as follows: “Scidit, abscidit, conscidit, incidit, excidit— to cut, to cut away, to cut in pieces, to cut or engrave, to cut off.”STTHD 58.4

Fifth witness. Mercerus, in his “Thesaurus,” furnishes a specimen of Rabbinical usage in the phrase, chatikah shel basar, “a piece of flesh,” or “a cut of flesh.” He translates the word as it occurs in Daniel 9:24, by “proecisa est,” was cut off.STTHD 59.1

Sixth witness. Arias Montanus in a literal version of the text translates it “decisa est,” was cut off; in the marginal reading, which is grammatically correct, the rendering is in the plural, “decisoe sunt,” were cut off.STTHD 59.2

Seventh witness. In the Latin version of Junius and Tremellius, nechtak (the passive of chathak) is rendered “decisoe sunt,” were cut off.STTHD 59.3

Eighth witness. Theodotion’s Greek version of Daniel (which is the version used in the Vatican copy of the Septuagint, as being the most faithful), renders it by, sunetmethesan, were cut off; and the Venetian copy by, tetmeentai, have been cut.STTHD 59.4

Ninth witness. In the Vulgate the phrase is, “abbreviatoe sunt,” have been shortened.STTHD 59.5

“Thus Chaldaic and Rabbinical authority, and that of the earliest versions, the Septuagint and Vulgate, give the single signification of cutting off to this verb.”STTHD 59.6

Tenth witness. Hengstenberg, who enters into a critical examination of the text, says: “But the very use of the word, which does not elsewhere occur, while others, much more frequently used, were at hand if Daniel had wished to express the idea of determination, and of which he has elsewhere, and even in this portion, availed himself, seems to argue that the word stands from regard to its original meaning, and represents the seventy weeks in contrast with a determination of time (en platei) as a period cut off from subsequent duration, and accurately limited.”—Christology of the Old Testament, vol. ii. p. 301. Washington, 1839.STTHD 60.1

This translation is further vindicated by Prof. N. N. Whiting, from whom a quotation has already been given, in the following language: “As the period of 2300 days is first given, and verses 21 and 23, compared with Daniel 8:16, show that the ninth chapter furnishes an explanation of the vision in which Gabriel appeared to Daniel, and of the ‘matter’-(the commencement of the 2300 days)-the literal (or rather, to speak properly, the only) signification demanded by the subject matter, is that of ‘cut off.’”—Midnight Cry, vol. iv. No. 17.STTHD 60.2

No further nor better evidence could be required on this point. Beyond question the seventy weeks are cut off from some other period; and just as evidently that other period is the 2300 days of chapter 8. Should it be asked why our translators rendered the word “determined” when it so obviously signifies “cut off,” a sufficient answer would be that they doubtless overlooked the connection between the 8th and 9th chapters; and considering it improper to speak of a period of time as cut off, when nothing was given from which it could be cut off, they gave the word its tropical instead of its literal meaning.STTHD 60.3

In connection with this point, we promised testimony from prominent writers on the prophecies who have acknowledged the connection between Daniel 8 and 9. In perusing them the reader will be able to decide which class have proved recreant to the original Advent faith, we who adhere still more tenaciously than ever to these views, or those who, without any assignable reason, repudiate and reject them. We commence with an extract from an article in the Advent Shield, which reads:—STTHD 61.1

“We call attention to one fact which shows that there is a necessary ‘connection’ between the seventy weeks of the ninth chapter, and something else which precedes or follows it, called ‘the vision.’ It is found in the 24th verse: ‘Seventy weeks are determined [or cut off] upon thy people ... to seal up the vision,’ etc. Now there are but two significations to the phrase ‘seal up.’ They are, first, ‘to make secret,’ and, secondly, ‘to make sure.’ We care not now in which of these significations the phrase is supposed to be used. That is not the point now before us. Let the signification be what it may, it shows that the prediction of the seventy weeks necessarily relates to something else beyond itself, called ‘the vision,’ in reference to which it performs this work, ‘to seal up.’ To talk of its sealing up itself is as much of an absurdity as to suppose that Josephus was so much afraid of the Romans that he refrained from telling the world that he thought the fourth kingdom of Daniel was ‘the kingdom of the Greeks.’ It is no more proper to say that the ninth chapter of Daniel ‘is complete in itself,’ than it would be to say that a map which was designed to show the relation of Massachusetts to the United States, referred to nothing but Massachusetts. It is no more complete in itself than a bond given in security for a note, or some other document to which it refers, is complete in itself;; and we doubt if there is a school-boy of fourteen in the land, of ordinary capacity, who would not on reading the ninth chapter, with an understanding of the clause before us, decide that it referred to something distinct from itself, called the vision. What vision it is, there is no difficulty in determining. It naturally and obviously refers to the vision which was not fully explained to Daniel, and to which Gabriel calls his attention in the preceding verse-the vision of the eighth chapter. Daniel tells us that Gabriel was commanded to make him understand that vision (8:16). This was not fully done at that interview connected with the vision; he is therefore sent to give Daniel the needed ‘skill and understanding,’ to explain its ‘meaning’ by communicating to him the prediction of the seventy weeks.”—Advent Shield, 1844.STTHD 61.2

“We claim that the ninth of Daniel is an appendix to the eighth, and that the seventy weeks and the 2300 days or years commence together. Our opponents deny this.”—Signs of the Times, 1843.STTHD 63.1

“The grand principle involved in the interpretation of the 2300 days of Daniel 8:14, is that the seventy weeks of Daniel 9:24, are the first 490 days of the 2300 of the eighth chapter.”—Advent Shield, p. 49.STTHD 63.2

“If the connection between the seventy weeks of Daniel 9, and the 2300 days of Daniel 8, does not exist, the whole system is shaken to its foundation; if it does exist, as we suppose, the system must stand.”—Harmony of Prophetic Chronology, p.33.STTHD 64.1

Says the learned Dr. Hales, in commenting upon the seventy weeks, “This chronological prophecy was evidently designed to explain the foregoing vision, especially in its chronological part of the 2300 days.”STTHD 64.2

What more need be said? The arguments which show the seventy weeks to be a part of the 2300 days, are all invulnerable. We may consider this question decided, and hereafter appeal to this decision as authoritative.STTHD 64.3