All communications for the Advent Herald, or orders for Books or remittances, should be directed to “J. V. Himes, Boston, Mass,” post paid.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.4

Post Masters are authorized by the Post Office Department to forward free of expense orders for, or to discontinue publications, and also money to pay for the same.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.5

Subscribers’ names with the State and Post Office should be distinctly given when money is forwarded Where the Post Office is not given, we are liable to misdirect the paper, or credit to the wrong person, as there are often several of the same name, or several Post Offices in the same town.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.6

DOW & JACKSON, PRINTERS.

ALWAYS REJOICING

JVHe

Air “Missionary Hymn.”HST January 29, 1845, page 193.7

I’m glad the Lord of glory
Is coming soon to reign,
With thousand thousand angels
His host a mighty train.
I’m glad he is descending
To take his “saphire” throne,
And that my heart is beating
In concert with his own!HST January 29, 1845, page 193.8

I’m glad the house of Israel,
Bound captive in the grave,
Are soon to have redemption
Through Him that died to save.
I’m glad he listens to the sigh,
“Our hopes are lost—are lost!”
And that he will remember
And call them from the dust!HST January 29, 1845, page 193.9

Oh yes, I’m glad he hears the saints
Each groaning in his cell,
“How long, Oh Lord, in bonds of death,
Shall we in darkness dwell?”
I’m glad he’ll give the “oil of joy”
To Zion’s mourning sons,
Whose bended ear doth catch the cry
Of all his hidden ones.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.10

I’m glad the earth beneath the curse
That lies all desolate,
Will be restored more glorious
Than Eden’s happy state.
I’m glad the gathered saints of God
With Jesus there will reign,
And saved from sorrow,sir and death,
Will never part again.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.11

I do rejoice “that blessed hope”
Revives the fainting soul,
And bears the sinking spirit up,
While stormy waters roll.
I’m ever joyful—trusting soon
I shall be summon’d home,
I wait to hear the trumpet sound,
“Arise! to Jesus come!”HST January 29, 1845, page 193.12

e. c. c.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.13

Worcester, 19th Dec. 1844.HST January 29, 1845, page 193.14

The Apocryphal Books

JVHe

It is a question among many, why these are not of the same authority as the canon of Scripture? Many suppose that a book’s being in or out of that canon, is dependant entirely upon the votes of councils; and we have heard it asserted that certain books were only rejected by a small majority. Now mere assertion is one thing, and documentary evidence is another. And before such assertions can be entitled to any weight, they should be sustained by the appropriate evidence. We therefore present a few extracts from the writings of Burnet, on this point, written 300 years ago. He says:—HST January 29, 1845, page 193.15

The New Testament

JVHe

“The canon of the New Testament, as we now have it, is fully proved from the quotations out of the books of the New Testament, by the writers of the first and second centuries: such as Clemens, Ignatius, Justin, Irenaus, and several others.” “The authority of those books is not derived from any judgment that the Church made concerning them; but from this, that it was known that they were writ, either by men who were themselves the apostles of Christ, or by those who were their assistants and companions, at whose order, or under whose direction and approbation it was known that they were written and published. These books were received and known for such, in the very apostolical age itself; so that many of the apostolical men, such as Ignatius and Polycarp, lived long enough to see the canon generally received and settled.” “Thus the canon of the New Testament is fixed upon clear and sure grounds.”HST January 29, 1845, page 193.16

The Old Testament

JVHe

“From thence, without any further proof, we may be convinced of the canon of the Old Testament. Christ does frequently cite Moses and the prophets; be appeals to them; and though he charged the Jews of that time, chiefly their teachers and rulers, with many disorders and faults, yet be never once so much as insinuated that they had corrupted their Law, or other Sacred Books; which if true, had been the greatest of all those abuses that they had put upon the people. Our Savior cited their books according to the translation that was then in credit and common use among them. When one asked him which was the great commandment, he answered, How reddest thou? And he proved the chief things relating to himself, his death and resurrection, from the prophecies that had gone before; which ought to have been fulfilled in him: He also cites the Old Testament, by a threefold division of the Law of Moses, the Prophets, and the Psalms; according to the three orders of books into which the Jews bad divided it. The Psalms, which was the first among the Holy Writings, being set for that whole Volume. St. Paul says, That to the Jews were committed the oracles of God. He reckons that among the chief of their privileges, but he never blames them for being unfaithful in this trust; and it is certain that the Jews have not corrupted the chief of those passages that are urged against them to prove Jesus to have been the Christ. So that the Old Testament, at least the translation of the LXX Interpreters, which was in common use and in high esteem among the Jews in our Savior’s time, was, as to the main, faithful and uncorrupted. This might be further urged from what St. Paul says concerning those Scriptures which Timothy had learned of a child; these could be no other than the Books of the Old Testament. Thus if the writings of the New Testament are acknowledged to be of Divine Authority, the full testimony that they give to the Books of the Old Testament, does sufficiently prove their authority and genuineness likewise.”HST January 29, 1845, page 193.17

The Apocryphal Writings

JVHe

“The chief reason that presses us Christians to acknowledge the Old Testament, is the testimony that Christ and his apostles gave to those Books, as they were then received by the Jewish Church; to whom were committed the oracles of God. Now it is not so much as pretended, that ever these Books were received among the Jews, or were so much as known to them. None of the writers of the New Testament cite or mention them; neither Philo nor Josephus speaks of them. Josephus on the contrary says, they had only twenty two books that deserved belief, but that those which were written after the time of Artaxerxes, were not of equal credit with the rest: and that in that period they had no prophets at all. The Christian Church was for some ages an utter stranger to those books. Melito, bishop of Sardis, being desired by Onesimus to give him a perfect catalogue of the books of the Old Testament, took a journey on purpose to the East, to examine the matter at its source; and having as he says made an exact enquiry, he sent him the names of them just as we receive the canon: of which Eusebius says, that he has preserved it, because it, contained all those books which the Church owned. Origen gives us the same catalogue according to the tradition of the Jews, who divided the Old Testament into twenty two books, according to the letters of their alphabet. Athanasius reckons them up in the same manner to be twenty two, and he more distinctly says that he delivered those, as they had received them by tradition, and as they were received by the whole Church of Christ, because some presumed to mix Apocryphal books with the Divine Scriptures: and therefore he was set on it by the orthodox brethren, in order to declare the canonical books delivered as such by tradition, and believed to be of divine inspiration. It is true, the adds, that besides these there were other books which were not put into the canon, but yet were appointed by the fathers to be road by those who first come to be instructed in the way of piety: and then he reckons up most of the Apocryphal books. Here is the first mention we find of them, as indeed it is very probable they were made at Alexandria, by some of those Jews who lived there in great numbers. Both Hilary and Cyril of Jerusalem, give us the same catalogue of the books of the Old Testament, and affirm that they delivered them thus according to the tradition of the ancients. Cyril says, that all other books are to be put in a second order. Gregory Nazienzen reckons up the twenty two books, and adds that none besides them are genuine. The words that are in the Article, are repeated by St. Jerom in several of his prefaces. And that which should determine this whole matter, is, that the Council of Laodicea by an express canon, delivers the catalogue of the cononical books as we do, decreeing that these only should be read in the Church. Now the canons of this Council were afterwards received into the code of the canons of the universal Church; so that here we have the concurring sense of the whole Church of God in this matter.”HST January 29, 1845, page 193.18

Letter from Bro. E. J. Austin

JVHe

Brother Himes:—When you announced the publication of Mr. Stow’s sermon of Boston, I expected to see an eloquent exposition of Bible truths, accompanied with so much religious experience, that we all should be strengthened in our purposes to stand forth as bold soldiers of the cross of Christ, and be ready to abide the day of trouble that is coming upon the earth. Daniel 12:1. But alas! we have been disappointed; we looked where we expected to find light, but all was darkness; I mean that light, which in every age of the world has illuminated the pathway of the Christian, and which if need be, could lead the possessor through the dark labyrinths of persecution and trial, always ready and willing to be “judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers.” Yes, that light, which points us to the resurrection, as the time, when the Redeemer shall come to Zion, “and they shall see his face, and his name shall be written in their foreheads.” Revelation 22:4.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.1

Our Savior has declared, that no man when he hath lighted a candle, hideth the light, but putteth it on a candlestick, that it may be seen by others. What then are we to understand by this light? According to the divine explanations, it is the word of God sown in good ground, which brings forth fruit with patience, Luke 8. Again, in James 3:17, “But the wisdom that is from above, is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits. Without partiality and without hypocrisy.” In comparing Mr. Stow’s discourse with the sacred canons, I find the wisdom which it contains is so foreign from the rule which has been prescribed for us to follow, that I feel constrained to express my surprise at the wanderings of its author. Suppose I should take our Savior’s sermon on the Mount, and undertake to harmonize it with the sentiments and principles of Mr. Stow’s sermon; would not the task be fruitless? I might as well attempt to unite the destinies of Jacob and Esau, or contend that the battles of Israel might be fought with Saul’s armor, or try to prove that the same fountain might produce sweet water and bitter.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.2

It is unfortunate for the cause of religion, that the faith of the pious and learned commentators of other ages, as well as the belief of a large multitude at the present day, is to be treated as delusion and fanatical by our popular ministry. The loud cry throughout Christendom seems to be, Down with “Millerism,” it is all a “delusion!” and the uproar which has been caused in some places, is as great as it was at Ephesus, when Paul by the preaching of the word excited the selfishness of the craftsmen, and they filled the city with confusion by crying, “Great is Diana of the Ephesians.” I belive there are many advent believers, who can sympatize with the persecutions of Paul, and for reasons that are analogous to those of the Shrine Makers of Ephesus.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.3

The time has come, in which the study of the scriptures are becoming important to the people: they feel the necessity of thinking and acting for themselves in all their religious responsibilities, and will take the expositions of God, rather than man, to establish their faith in the prophecies. The controversy which is now agitating the public mind as to a “terrene millennium,” is exciting a great deal of interest. And it is well known, that unless the advocates of the present orthodox views do something to check the tide of doubt and unbelief which is fast gathering around this superstructure, it must be overwhelmed and lost. Unfortunately for the churches, they have predicated all their efforts upon this grand consummation. They have brought into being their Education Societies—their domestic and foreign Missionary Societies—their Bible and Tract Societies—besides many other auxiliaries of a similar nature, and they are all built upon the highly wrought and fanciful project, that the world is to be evangelized, and that, too, through their instrumentalty. Well, if they call us deluded and fanatical in what we are doing, what shall we say about them; why, simply that, in our opinion, they are building a label, and that God will, as he did of old, confound their language.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.4

There is perhaps no worse characteristic of the times than the efforts that are in progress to divert the mind from all that relates to the coming and kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ. From the pulpit and the press the seeds of prejudice are sown with profusion. Yet the work goes on; oh! how many souls have been lost by prejudice—“that damning prejudice which lives beyond the grave.” What, I ask, is worse to contend against than the prejudice of the human heart? Mr. Stow has appealed in his discourse to this baser part of our nature, and can he expect to reap the peaceable fruits of righteousness? He may blow his trumpet of dulusion, he may call the religion of the Advent cause the work of the devil, he may guard the doors of his church against the “Laymen of limited abilities,” and others of a kindred faith, but he cannot take away our hope of heaven. Our Savior has said, that all sins shall be forgiven but the sin against the Holy Ghost! May we never be so unfortunate as to acribe the influences of the Holy Spirit upon others to Beelzebub the prince of devils, lest we be left without a promise, and despair of eternal life.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.5

The cause is progressing here, and in the adjacent towns. Your mission to Vermont has done us all good, and I trust we shall all be profited by your example of good works; Go on, brother, you have nothing to fear. Our hearts beat in unison with yours, in the glorious hope of meeting you again among the redeemed in heaven. E. J. Austin.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.6

Vergennus, Jan. 8th, 1845.

Letter from Alabama

JVHe

Dear Brethren:—I am so much blessed in reading the experience of the Advent brethren and sisters, found in the Herald, since the passing by of the tenth day of the seventh month, and hearing of their strong faith in the speedy coming of Christ, that I think it may encourage some to hear that a few here in Mobile are endeavoring to keep their lamps trimed and burning. Myself and brother Shepherd embraced the belief in the tenth, we expected to have met our Savior at that time. We are now waiting patiently unto the coming of the Lord. We have but very few to sympathize with us, and therefore hail the arrival of the “Herald” as bringing good news. It does revive my soul to hear of one after another who are yet strong in the faith, giving glory to God.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.7

My dear brethren, when I read of the persecutions which you suffer, I suffer with you. I enter as it were into your feelings. We have the utmost confidence in you, and feel assured you are engaged in the cause of God. My faith never was stronger than it is now in the personal second advent of Christ being near, even at the doors. It seems to me, we can now say we know it is near, all the signs have been fulfilled, so far as I am able to see. Even the foolish virgins have said, give us of your oil, for our lamps are gone out. Some that have been believers in the doctrine, have called on us, and said they wished they could see as we did. Two ministers called at my door, while absent, and wanted to know where I found the doctrine. Now the fact is, they have the Lamp, (the Bible,) but have not faith (or oil in their vessels.)HST January 29, 1845, page 194.8

In conclusion, I would say to all, Be strong; quit you like men; have on the whole armor of God. Ephesians 6:10, 11. Brethren of the Herald, continue your paper until the coming of the Lord. Be found at your posts. It is a welcome messenger to us. In all your afflictions we are afflicted with you. The leaven of Bush-ism is working here. Some already begin to doubt a scriptural resurrection. May the Lord keep us from such views. Brethren, pray for us that we may be enabled to stand. We desire very much to be with you. Often, when I hear of your communion seasons, I have a wish to be with you, as we are deprived of that privilege here, having no one to administer it to us. We hope soon to partake of it in the Kingdom of God. Your unworthy brother. Enoch Noyes.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.9

Mobile, Alabama, Dec. 29th, 1844.

The “Great Supper.”

JVHe

Luke 14:16. A certain man made a great supper, and bade many. Compare with Matthew 22:2-10.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.10

First Message

JVHe

Verse 17th. “And sent his servants at supper time to say to them that were bidden, come, for all things are now ready.” Explanation given by “Wes. Mid. Cry.” “A call to supper implies a little previous notice, that guests may cease from the labors of the day, and prepare themselves. This text has had its fulfillment in the proclamation of the coming of the Lord in or about 1843.”HST January 29, 1845, page 194.11

Verse 18th. “And they all with one consent began to make excuse. The first said unto him, I have bought a piece of ground, and must needs go and see it: I pray thee have me excused.” “Or in other words” the Lord cannot come yet, for there are large portions of the earth yet uninhabited. “A piece of ground” in the way.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.12

Verse 19th. “And another said, I have bought five yoke of oxen, and I go to prove them, I pray thee have me excused.” “I have so much business on hand that I have not time to examine the subject.”HST January 29, 1845, page 194.13

Verse 20th. “And another said, I have married a wife, and therefore cannot come.” “It is well to be ready, but as for me, it is my business to attend to my family,” etc.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.14

Second Message

JVHe

Verse 21. “Go out quickly in the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor, the maimed, the halt and the blind.” And quickly was the “Midnight Cry” sounded through the land, and even “the poor” in the “streets and lanes of the cities” heard the proclamation! But the “Marriage Supper” is yet future: and another message is to be given.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.15

Third Message

JVHe

Verse 23d. “Go out into the highways and hedges and compel them to come in that my house may be filled.” Compare with Matthew 22:9, 10. “Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the “marriage.” So those servants went into the highways and gathered all, as many as they found; and the wedding was furnished with guests.” This shows that there is yet another message to be delivered by God’s servants, (though not to the world in general,) which will gather the few scattered ones and fill the House of God. Heath.HST January 29, 1845, page 194.16

From the Investigator.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.1

Letter from Bro. S. S. Snow

JVHe

To the Editor of the Investigator:HST January 29, 1845, page 195.2

Dear Sir,—I perceive by what I have recently seen in the Advent Herald, that you are somewhat anxious to learn the truth respecting some statements that have been made in that paper, relating in part to a certain “Bro Snow,” who was once an Infidel, but is now loooking for the Lord. You have, it seems, requested me to communicate to you a statement of the facts in the case, showing how far I had been an Infidel, etc. Now, as I wish to treat every man and every subject candidly and fairly—as I feel compassion for many who are, as I once was, in the blindness of Infidelity—and as I mean to be ready at all times to give a reason for the hope that is in me—I will comply with your request.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.3

In regard to the printed speech which was published in the Herald, I weuld say that it is a correct, though, of course, not a full history of my experience. I was for six years, from 1833 to 1839, a subscriber for the Investigator, and an occasional contributor to its columns. And if you will refer to the files ‘38 and ‘39, you will find my name in the list of agents.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.4

My unbelief in the Bible was of the most thorough and determined kind. I judged of its doctrines by the standard of popular theology—and of its practical precepts by the conduct of the churches. In this I wofully misjudged. But I knew no better. And had I never received any more light upon the Scriptures than I obtained from the preaching and writings of the clergy in general, I should doubtless have continued an Infidel to this day. I was, however, far from being satisfied with my views. My mind was frequently agitated like the wave of the troubled ocean. At times, I felt a strong desire to find proof, if any existed, that the Bible was indeed the Word of God. But there seemed insuperable difficulties, owing to my deficiency of knowledge respecting those truths which is taught. And it is to be lamented that the mass of the people are as ignorant as I was. But many are prevented from avowing themselves Infidels, merely from the force of education, or from a regard to reputation. If all mankind were honest enough to declare their real sentiments, you would, no doubt, have the majority with you. No thanks to a corrupt church and hireling clergy that I am not an Infidel at present.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.5

But when I began to examine candidly and carefully the doctrine of the Second Advent, a flood of light was poured upon my mind which very soon swept away all darkness and doubt, and convinced me that “the prophecy came not in old time by the will of men; but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.” I began to see on every page of the Bible the impress of its Divine Author. I saw that the prophetic scriptures constituted a most clear and accurate historical delineation of events in the great drama of the world—written long before the events transpired. The question came home to my mind with overwhelming force, “How came the writers by all this perfect knowledge of future events?”—I was constrained to believe that this Book, which I had so long rejected and despised, was in truth a revelation from God.—Not only so, but it taught me clearly that the great day of consummation, when God the great Emperor of the Universe shall purge this province of His Empire from all moral and physical evil, was just upon us. And though there might be some little uncertainty in regard to those dates from which the periods of time given in the prophecy of Daniel must be reckoned, yet this could by no means weaken the conclusive proofs that we were drawing very near the time of restitution of all things spoken of by the mouth of all the holy prophets since the world began. I therefore bowed my will in meek subjection to what was clearly shown to be the Word o God.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.6

Since then, my course has been onward and upward. My path, I trust, is as the dawning light, that shineth more and more unto the perfect day. I have pledged myself before God and man, that if he grant me life, and health, and grace, and an open door, I will preach this blessed gospel of the kingkom of God, till the King shall come in his glory. I sincerely believe, and from the very best of evidence, that “Jesus Christ is the Son of God “and the Savior of the world—and that he is speedily coming to complete the destruction of the works of the Devil—restore the creation from the ruins of the fall—and reign “King over all the earth.” My dear Sir, “Search the Scriptures,” and see if these things are not even so. Yours truly,HST January 29, 1845, page 195.7

Sam’l S. Snow.
N. Y. Dec 27th, 1841.

Remarks on the above by the Investigator

JVHe

A Converted Infidel—Remarks on Prophecy

Agreeable to our promise, we publish in today’s Investigator the letter of Mr. Samuel S. Snow, in relation to his conversion from Infidelity to Millerism; and as it contains, in our opinion, some erroneous views in regard to the character of the Bible, particularly in respect to its prophecies, we have concluded to make it the text for a few comments. We would observe, however, before proceeding to our remarks upon prophecy, that while we thank our Christian friend for his courtesy and kindness in complying with our request, we are somewhat disappointed in the nature of his communication. We expected, from what we had seen and heard of his conversion, that he had been a very firm, decided, determined Infidel—one who was thoroughly convinced of the truth of Infidelity and perfectly willing to repose upon its teachings, being satisfied, beyond the shadow of a doubt, of their entire conformity with fact and reality. Our Infidelity hath this extent, and we believe it is thus with all who are really and truly bona fide Infidels; but Mr. Snow appears, from his letter, not to have been of this class,—We make no question but that he was thoroughly sincere, and we should be very sorry if he understands us otherwise. What we mean is, his mind was wavering, unsettled, fluctuating, To use his own language, “I was (said he) far from being satisfied with my views. My mind was frequently agitated like the waves of the troubled ocean. At times, I felt a strong desire to find proof, if any existed, that the Bible was indeed the Word of God.” This is no doubt the language of sincerity, but not of stability, firmness, reliance, confidence. Mr. Snow was not, to be sure, a Christian; we admit thus much; but, as his language above quoted evidently discovers an unsettled mind, we cannot agree with him when he says, “My unbelief in the Bible was of the most thorough and determined kind:” for if it had been, he never would have “felt a strong desire to find proof that the Bible was indeed the Word of God,” because he would previously have demonstrated, to his own conviction, that it was not. The man who does not do this, although he may discard the name of Christian, is not in our opinion a “thorough and determined” Infidel.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.8

We come now to a consideration of prophecy, which as Mr. Snow thinks, proves the Bible to be the word of God. Prophecy is nothing more nor less than future history. Hence it must be evident in the least reflecting, that prophecy, to answer its design and come up to the demands and majesty of its object, must be a most plain, circumstantial, and dignified history of persons, places, and events yet to come, thrown so far forward in time as to prevent conjecture, and made in so many places and written in so many different languages as to preclude the possibility of interpolation and spuriousness. Had the entire history of the undiscovered continent of America, with all the improvements in the mode of warfare, mechanics, government, laws; its geography as to lakes, bays, rivers, seas and islands, hills and mountains; its steamboats and cars described, with the lines of action; and every important event specified as to the name of the place and person—and had all this been written at the same time in every language, professedly to lay the foundation of faith, it would then have been just what, and no more than what, the nature of the case requires; and it was surely in the compass of Almighty power and infinite wisdom to effect it, both in its origin and result. Attained, and there would have been a foundation for a noble temple, firm, deep, and solid, and as extensive as human faith and worship. As it is, we are called to admire splendid imaginary domes and spires radiant with eternal glory, but forbid to descend to the foundation, its corner-stones, and pillars and walls, or if we do, to go blindfolded by fanatic superstition; if we tear away the bandage—all vanishes!HST January 29, 1845, page 195.9

If a history of the past would be unworthy of confidence, written in semi-poetic, semi-proasic language, in which animals were made to personify men, and their actions and battles a series of events, it would be extremely puerile to suppose, and rudely arrogant to insist, that the same in style, character, and imagery, should be adequate to answer the high design of history in future—prophecy. Now it happens that the histories in future in the Old and New Testament,—except a few which we shall consider, and which come within the scope of probable conjecture,—are exactly of this character. A single example is sufficient The Macedonian invasion of Persia, in which the he goat and ram represent the event in its persons, vicissitudes, and results. Who, with a symbolic history in his hand, in which the persons are represented by animals, geographical limits by their movements, and results by their triumph over each other or defeat, would conceive himself either guided or instructed? What man of sense will take Ossian’s Poems as even a probabe history of the infancy of Scotland? And yet they are as much above the one in the case supposed and under consideration, as plain and faithful narrative in. moral instruction would be superior to dreams and visions.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.10

Adverting to the specified instances, as in the destruction of Babylon, Tyre, and Jerusalem, we at once perceive, as stated, that they come within the circle of probable conjecture. What reflecting man, regarding things as they were, might not have predicted the same? That Babylon, the capital of the world, would, in the issues of battle and change of commerce and dominion, become plundered, sacked, deserted, and a ruin? The same of Tyre. And what political foresight, much less prophetic impulse, did it require to declare, in all the confidence of truth, that Jerusalem should, before a single generation passed, be surrounded by a trench and not one stone left upon another?—The Jews were an obstinate, superstitious, and brave people. Jerusalem was considered an impregnable fortress. The Roman power was at its height. It was well known that it had become indignant at the province of Judea. It had been learned, in terrible example, as in the case of Veii Etruscum, Corinth, and Carthage, that, in case of a seige, entrenchment was certain, and desolation almost absolutely sure. The seige took place, and the prophecy was fulfilled. And upon this foundation we must rest our faith! We need not carry the argument another step. The prophecy of the Bible, were there no other proof, plainly established the fact that it is the mere work of man and not of God.HST January 29, 1845, page 195.11

As we have published in the Investigator the letter of Messrs. McMurry and Snow, we would take it very kindly it the Advent Herald would insert in its columns the whole of the foregoing article.—InvestigatorHST January 29, 1845, page 196.1

Advent Herald & Reporter

No Authorcode

“The Lord is at Hand.”

BOSTON, JANUARY 29, 1845.

Bro. Snow and the Investigator

JVHe

We cheerfully comply with the request from the Investigator to give their article, which with Bro Snow’s article will be found in another column, an insertion, as they have so promptly published the letters referred to.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.2

The great objection the Investigator adduces against the claims of prophecy is that it is not sufficiently minute. Any one can see however that it is not the object of the Bible to note every unimportant point; and such a minuteness would swell the Scriptures to such a size that they would more seldom be read, which would defeat the very end of their being. The sole object of prophecy, is to give all outline of future events, enunciated with sufficient clearness that men may know the period of time they occupy in historical prophecy; and by the successive fulfilment of predicted events be satisfied with the authenticity of Revelation, walk in accordance with its precepts, trust in its promises, and regard its threatnings. If prophecy is sufficiently minute to accomplish this, all additional minuteness would be superfluous for the accomplishment of such an end.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.3

We then come to the question, Are the prophecies sufficiently minute, to show us the period in prophetical history that we occupy, and to demonstrate that it could have been indited only by One who knew the end from the beginning? That it is sufficiently minute for this purpose, early Infidels never questioned. Their argument was that the prophecies were too minute! Porphyry, a noted Infidel of the third century, was driven to the conclusion that some of them were so plain and minute, that they could only be historical records, and must have been written subsequently to their fulfilment!HST January 29, 1845, page 196.4

The Investigator contends, that the predictions respecting Babylon, Tyre, etc., “come within the circle of probable conjecture,” and that “any reflecting man might have predicted the same.” It is true that men do sometimes make correct guesses respecting the future. But who would dare to risk his reputation upon the fulfillment of a volume of guesses? for the failure of one would destroy his prophetic claims. Yet here is the volume of Inspiration filled with predictions extending through all times, uttered hundreds of years before the fulfillment of some portions, and foretelling events which man would never have supposed possible, and not a prediction has thus far been shown to be erroneous. The predictions of the Bible are so distinct that no one would apply them to two different events; whereas if they were mere general surmises, they might be applied irrespectively to a hundred objects. And they farther are so particular in their application, that all human foresight could never have thus minutely unveiled the future.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.5

Look at Babylon:—The manner of its assault, the condition and conduct of the besieged, the name of the General who should command the army, were all given 150 years before their fulfilment. Now no man could ever have thus conjectured respecting it; and would have been as likely to have made the same conjectures respecting any other city. Who would have presumed thirty years before the battle of New Orleans, to make a prediction that such a battle would be fought at such a time, and give the name of the General who should defend that city, with the manner of his defence, and its result? No one, certainly. Even the editor of the Investigator will not risk his reputation in predicting any of the extraordinary events which will transpire the present month Who would have supposed, there would be just four,—no more and no less—mighty empires from the time of Daniel, worthy of being recorded by historians as “universal monarchies? “Or who could have predicted that the third would be divided into four kingdoms, while the fourth would be divided into ten? Who could have conjectured that Babylon would ever become pools of water? And why was not the same conjecture made respecting some other city? Why was it not said of Babylon, as of Tyre, that her dust shall be scraped from off her? And who would even have conjectured of Tyre that her soil would actually be scraped off, so that it should actually become “a place for the spreading of nets in the midst of the sea?” Or why was not the same conjecture made of some other city? Why was it not said of Palmyra, or Athens, or Ephesus, or Rome, or of any other place but Babylon, that the shepherds would not make their fold there, or the Arabian pitch his tent? Who could have guessed that the destruction of the temple would be so complete that not one stone would be left upon another? Or that Jerusalem would be trodden under the foot of the Gentiles to the end, of “the seven times?” Who would have predicted that the Jews would serve the king of Babylon just 70 years, and at the end of these 70 years the king of Babylon would be destroyed, and that nation be come a tributary?HST January 29, 1845, page 196.6

Questions like the above might be extended without limit. But when we see that the predictions respecting each city or event could have been applicable to none other; and that those respecting each were fulfilled in all their minutia, it would be sufficient we should suppose to prove the impress of the Divine Mind upon prophecies so extended in their scope, so minute in their application, and so exact in their fulfillment.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.7

Editorial Correspondence

JVHe

Lectures in Norwich

Dear Brother Bliss.—I commenced my labors in this city on Sunday last. In the afternoon a lecture was given at Greenville, a village about one mile from the city, to a full and deeply interesting auditory. In the evening, the Court House, in the city, being vacated for our use, we commenced our regular meetings there. The place was filled, and the audience listened with profound attention to some of the reasons of our hope. During the week the weather has been unfavorable to a large attendance, but we had good audiences of candid persons, who are, like the “noble Bereans,” searching the Scriptures daily to see whether these things are so. Some interest is awakened, but as yet, there is nothing like a general movement; except, as is always the case, there is a general talk. The Advent or “Millerism,” is the theme of conversation in the social circles. It also affords an occasion for the scoffing editors, who are still troubled with the hobgoblins of their own creation, of “frauds,” “ruin of families,” “suicides,” “murders,” and “insanity,” which they suppose are the legitimate fruits of the Advent doctrine. Each of the city papers has given a notice of our meetings, and of myself, and Bro. Brown, who is with us—The old slanders are again repeated, as though they were all true. Instead of confessing their sins, and asking forgiveness for their past injustice, towards a slandered and abused fellow citizen, who never injured them, or ever sought in his labors for them, or others, aught but good, they reiterate the old foul and infamous slanders, and seek to fasten pubic reproach and infamy upon us, and thereby to destroy the effect of our labors, as far as lies in their power. But what else can we expect of infidels and libertines; or of others among this class, who may be more decent in their life and deportment, who yet equally hate the idea of the holy reign of the Lord Jesus Christ with his saints? And what else can we expect of our Pharisees aud Scribes, and their scoffing sympathizers who hang upon their skirts? We look in vain for justice from this “wicked and adulterous generation,”—we don’t expect it. They know they don’t tell the truth, and that they cannot prove a single charge that they ever preferred against us. Do they not know that by such a course, they effectually bring upon us the blessing of God, (though their own hearts don’t mean so,) contained in Matthew 5:11, 12?—“Blessed are ye when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.”HST January 29, 1845, page 196.8

Bro. F. G. Brown, who is laboring with success at Worcester, has been with us most of the week, and rendered us essential aid in the meeeting. He returns on Saturday, and I go to New London to commence another campaign.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.9

The state of the Churches in this city and vicinity, if we are to believe their own statements, is most lamentable. We heard one discourse on the subject, which went to prove that the Churches throughout the country were left in an awful state of darkness and death at this time, and that all efforts, as yet, to revive or restore them, were abortive. They have had their “feasts,” to revive their drooping hopes, and these only added to their desolations; and now they are having their “fasts,” and as yet God does not regard them. I hope next they will see their folly and wickedness in opposing the coming of the Bridegroom, repent, and prepare for his speedy advent. When this is done, they may rationally hope for the approbation and blessing of God upon them. J. V. Himes.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.10

Norwich, Jan. 18th, 1845.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.11

New London: Bro. Himes writes: Dear Bro. Bliss.—I finished my labors in Norwich on Friday evening last and came to this place on Saturday evening. I gave a lecture in the Court House last evening to a large audience. But there an effort was made by some of the chief Scribes and Pharisees, to shut us out of that. All the Meeting Houses are closed, and now the “Select men,” have shut us out of the Court House. This will be a rich affair. We have got the Temperance Hall, and I suppose they will try to shut us out of that next. But in any case we shall have a victory.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.12

Jan. 19th, 1845.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.13

Notice.—All communications for Bro. Philo Hawks should be directed to Meriden, Ct.HST January 29, 1845, page 196.14

Esdras

JVHe

But how came it in the Apocrypha? Why, many centuries after the book was written, a convention of men (for whom I believe no one claims divine inspiration,) declared it uninspired. It is however a conceded fact that Esdras was rejected by a majority simply of one, i. e. 23 out of 47 of that learned body of divines declared it worthy of being received as divinely inspired. Take another fact in relation to the decisions of that council. The book of Revelation, one of the most interesting portions of the New Testament scriptures—the Key to Daniel, and without which that interesting prophecy could never have been understood, was saved by a majority of only one. Thus we see that one vote would have placed Esdras in the sacred canon and Revelation in the Apocrypha. And the some objection that now exists against Esdras being received would have existed against the Revelation.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.1

Voice of Truth.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.2

Statements like the above have been frequently put forth; but we have never yet been able to find any ancient document, or copy of any ancient document, or any person who ever saw such document or copy containing such a fact Now unless such exist, by what authority are such assertions made? And unless such can be produced, to what do they amount? If therefore any one can produce such evidence, let it be forth coming; or, let ti be regarded as unsustained by evidence. We are often too ready to make assertions upon hearsay testimony; and many sad mistakes have thus been made.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.3

Now the decision of a council cannot affect, pro, or con, the inspiration of any book. And even if the vote of such a council could be proved respecting the books of John and Esdras, they would then be far from being on the same footing. The book of Revelation is known to have been written by John on the Isle of Patmos; it was presented by him as an inspired book; it was received by the church from him as such; Polycarp and Papias, the disciples of John, received it as such; and the entire church so regarded it. Afterwards, when the church had become corrupt, to avoid the Millennarian doctrine, some endeavored to destroy the canonical authority of the book; but they were unsuccessful. But had they succeeded in having it condemned by some council, it would not have destroyed the evidence of the authenticity of the book: for it was received by the entire church as inspired, from John, who professed to receive it from God as such.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.4

But the evidence of the inspiration of Esdras, rests upon no such cornerstone. It purports to have been written six hundred years before the Christian era; and yet no trace of its existence previous to that era can be found! To the Jews were committed the keeping of the oracles of God, they were never accused of being unfaithful in that particular, and yet no trace of it, or any reference to it is found in their writings. It has never been found in any ancient manuscript of the Hebrew or Chaldea language, in which it must have been written, if it thus early appeared; and there is no reference to it, or any evidence that it was known or existed in the early ages of Christianity. Consequently it was not received as from God by this people, as every book in the Bible was, at the time it was delivered.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.5

The first that was known of Esdras was its appearance several hundred years after it was purported to be written, in a language different from that in which it would thus have been written; and by those among whom it first appeared, it was regarded with no more confidence, than we now attach to the “Book of Mormon.” And had the Book of Mormon made its appearance then, it would now stand on the same level with Esdras, as respects its claims for authenticity; and it would have as valid a claim for being written in the days in which it purports to be written. But the Revelation of John stands upon much higher grounds; it was received as canonical by all councils because it was always received as such by the early Christians; but Esdras was rejected as such by all councils, because it was never recognized by the church as such. It becomes as to regard the evidence upon which those councils acted, and not the mere vote of the councils.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.6

“A Weighty Affair.”

JVHe

The above is the heading of an article in the Biblical Recorder, a Baptist paper, in reference to the Christian Watchman of this city.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.7

It seems that the article we referred to some time since in the Watchman of Mr. Dowling respecting the “Closing scence of Millerism,” in New York, etc.,—in which he stood forth as public mourner for deceased Advent babies which are still living;—was copied into the “Recorder,” without due credit to the Watchman. For this the Watchman called the Recorder to an account, and charged it with inserting it “in headed type prefaced from our own correspondent,” etc., etc. In reply, the Recorder says:—HST January 29, 1845, page 197.8

“That the article was ‘set up in leaded type,” is not the fact. Nor is it a fact that the said article was ‘prefaced,’ as above charged, or in any other way—the words quoted having been copied by the printer, with the rest of the article, from the Watchman. The insinuation contained in the above, that the credit was intentionally withheld, or that there was any design, or ambition to make the article appear as original matter in the Recorder, is worthy of the source whence it proceeded, and could have originated, it seems to us, only with a mind familiar with such motives.”HST January 29, 1845, page 197.9

And “lest a repetition of the offence should occur, we hereby promise our cotemporary to transfer nothing more from his columns, unless it be something which we may see cause to copy for the purpose of animadversion. That the reader may have some idea of the amount of benefit accruing to us from the selections referred to, we would say, that the Recorder containing it, has been returned to us from the office of the ‘Advent Herald’, enclosing a number of that paper, in which the article from the Watchman is declared to be UNTRUE, and calling on us for a correction of its MISSTATEMENTS.”HST January 29, 1845, page 197.10

It will be seen by the foregoing, that Mr. Crowell is regarded by some of his own brethren in the same light that we regard him.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.11

Human Chronology.—We often hear remarks of a want of confidence in human chronology, and an attempt made to show when the periods end independent of it. But let it be remembered, that however defective human chronology may be, it is all the guide we have for the measurement of time since the crucifixion, and we are also dependent upon it alone for any approximation or clue to the years from which to date any of the events recorded in the Scriptures.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.12

Letter from Mr. Miller

JVHe

Dear Bro. Himes.—I have just finished reading the second number of “The Advent Shield,” and I never left off reading any book, save the Bible, with such a deep and heartfelt anxiety to have all Christians of all denominations read it, as I do this. I said to myself, if all Christians would candidly, and honestly read and compare this with the word of God, all prejudice and preconceived opinions, which serve now to divide, distract, and confuse, the dear family of God on earth, would be removed, and we should all see eye to eye, on the great and glorious subject of the return of the dear Master from heaven. Or at least, they would all see the necessity for it, and love and pray for it, and thus our hearts and our prayers, as well as our eyes, would be as one. I immediately began in my mind to devise some plan by which the object could be effected: and the first plan which my imaginative mind invented was for every Brother or Sister, who was already confimed in the truth of these things, and was able, to supply themselves with a copy,—and there are but very few but what can supply themselves, or be supplied—then we would all of us consider ourselves bound to go to one Christian friend at least every week, and by kind and benevolent means, get them to read and digest, and be converted to these glorious truths. I then calculated that when any one was truly converted, they would make another fresh and efficient missionary. I went so far in my imaginations as to calculate that one a week for every missionary would be light work, and thus continue on in arithmetical progression, and to my surprise, I found the whole world would be converted to see eye to eye in a very few months. What can this mean? said I, to myself, has not the world wisdom enough to try this plan before? Surely there are thousands now living on the earth wiser and better than myself: why has not the thing been tried, and succeeded before? I then began to look about me for a precedent—and my mind first lit upon Jesus Christ; surely, said I he had when on earth more wisdom than all living to devise means, he had all power to accomplish his plan, he had love enough to prompt him to execute it; for he gave his life to redeem lost man; and if this plan would insure success, he would never fail. I therefore reviewed his life, and found that almost the first act of his ministry was to send out his 12 disciples, and other seventy also, to go two and two into every city in Judea, and into private houses, and if possible persuade men that the Kingdom of God had come nigh unto them. He endued them with power from on High to work miracles as a confirmation of the truth of their proclamation. And what was the effect? We cannot exactly tell. We know some things which it did not do. It did not convert but few, if any their political rulers, none of their learned faculty of literati, no Lawyers or Scribes, not one, as we can learn, of all their Priests, nor any of their principal sects of Pharisees or Saducees at that time; and it is evident, if there were any, they must have been of the common sort, and the number so small that they were not noticed by even their opposers. Some few years afterwards, the church at Jerusalem tried the same plan. They were by persecution driven out of the city, and went everywhere preaching faith, repentance, and the resurrection, although they had some better success; yet in comparison to the many who heard, for Paul says their sound went out to the ends of the earth, but very few believed. Again, it has been tried in this our day; for fifty years the Protestant Churches have been sending missionaries, Bibles, tracts and publications without number, and is the world converted? No. It has waxed worse and worse. The German churches have embraced Neology. The English are, many of them, going back into Papacy, and the American churches are calling in the world to eat and drink with them on the brink of ruin. And the man of sin already outnumbers them altogether, and will soon obtain civil power over the whole continent, unless Christ should come, which is our only salvation and hope.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.13

My visionary scheme was demolished at a blow, and became, like Nebuchadnezzer’s image, as the chaff of the summer threshing floor. But I feel very thankful to you and the dear brethren, who have contributed to furnish such an intellectual feast. And I have learned that while the world stands, under the present means of grace, among the discordant views of so many sects, and all the leaders and teachers of these sects, using all the means in their power to keep the people under them, ignorant of their weak points, and of their opponents’ strong points, monopolizing all the knowledge, to the exclusion of all who may disagree in any one thing from them, that the world cannot be converted and see eye to eye? They cannot: each denomination must have their own commentaries, libraries, tracts, publications, and some of them their own translations of the Bible. And thus only a few independent minds know any thing farther than the teachers of their several sects are pleased to dictate. Methodists must hear nothing but Methodism, and that is what their rectors or popes shall allow them to be taught; thus from the Romanists down through all denominations, it is the same. How then can it be possible for us to be a unit, or see eye to eye; unless we must have Christ, or Antichrist, for our head, the kingdom of men, or the Kingdom of God. Then let us pray, “Thy Kingdom Come.” Come Lord Jesus, come quickly. Wm. Miller.HST January 29, 1845, page 197.14

Low Hampton, Jan. 16th, 1845.

Br. A. M. Osgood’s address, is New Market, N. H.

To the Opponent

JVHe

Those of our opposers who have published on the book of Daniel, must admit three important truths of our faith, or they have proved themselves dishonest. They must confess that the time of the end has come, that the vision is unsealed, and that the wise may understand. If they will not admit this, their “works” have clearly shown their dishonesty. It is well known that Adventists believe that the time of the end has come and that the book of Daniel is unsealed, and have used it in defence of their faith. But our opponents have denied that we are living in the time of the end, and ridiculing us for pretending to understand, they have taken this book (which Gabriel declared should be sealed until the time of the end, Daniel 12:9, and given a different interpretation to the public to refute our arguments. But why have they attempted to interpret the vision, which, according to their faith, is yet closed and sealed. (See Stuart’s Hints, works of Chase, and Colver, etc.) This looks like the magician tricks of olden time. At least it shows that they have only guessed at the meaning of Daniel’s prophecy. And in attempting to do this they have surely been guilty of “prying into the secrets of the Almighty.” H. H.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.1

The Church of Rome

JVHe

A writer in the Christian Advocate and Journal, supposed to be Signor Bargnani, an accomplished Doctor of Laws and refuge from Papal tyranny, says that “In 1836 there were in the United States 12 bishops, 1 archbishops 341 priests, 300 churches, 10 colleges 31 convents, and 600,000 of the Roman Catholic denomination.” And that the increase of the Romish church in this country since 1836 amounts to 12 bishops, 293 priests, 772 churches and other stations, 1,400,000 individuals, and other things in propotion.” He then adds “Should the said church go on increasing for the next thirty years as she has done for the last eight years, the papists would be a majority of the population of the United States, and the pope our supreme temporal ruler.”HST January 29, 1845, page 198.2

In England, since 1814, the Romish church has also increased in an astonishing degree; and should she increase in the same proportion for the next thirty years, the pope would rule Great Britain also, and the dream of Gregory VII. would become a frightful reality; for the papal system is a theocracy, or a politico-religious despotism. Wherever the civil power is too strong for her, popery clings to it, and adds to its strength in return for the support, or toleration she may derive from it. Wherever the civil power is weak, Popery twists itself around it, and gradually smothers it down to a mere instrument of her own political domination.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.3

The fundamental principle of the Romish faith, salvation by works, and through the church, places the laity at the feet of the priesthood, and the now universally received rule of that faith, the infallible aud irresistible authority of the church, places the supreme pontiff over the neck of his flock, and annihilates the individuality and independence of the nations.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.4

The spiritual evils may be summed up in a few words. They begin and end in the exclusive compulsory establishment of her religious creed. Now this creed “has nothing of Christ.” as Francisco Vettori said, but the name.”HST January 29, 1845, page 198.5

The temporal evils may be seen in the intellectual, moral, and economical condition of Roman Catholic countries. Whoever reads the history of Itily, Spain, Ireland, Central America, and of England, Prussia, and the United States, etc., will see that their different religious systems had the greatest share in the ruin of the former, and the prosperity of the latter. But on a further examination he will find also that Mohammedanism and heathenism are compatible with the temporal prosperity of the nations, and that Romanism is their heaviest curse. Spain is now a dreary waste, haunted by beggars; under the Moors it was the best country in Europe. The western portion of the Roman states is now a pestilential desert; the lower part of Itily, Sicily, Sardinia, etc., are among the most backward regions of christendom. And yet in the republican times of Rome and Greece those desolate provinces were the garden of the world. Protestanism has converted the wilderness of New England into the most flourishing abode of industry, religion, and liberty; and Romanism has turned the populous regions of Central America into a lonely waste, where the few degraded remnants of the indigenous populations have lost even the recollectien of their former greatness. But Rome herself is the best emblem of popery. There sits the eternal city in the centre of a desert, herself more than half deserted, and, as if ashamed of the surrounding desolation, anxious to fly to the neighboring mountains. Her own creature, the malaria, seems bent on her extermination.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.6

We see Rome now in open league with the reigning princes of her communion against their people, while she is stirring up the disaffected portion of the people, in protestant countries, against their several governments, and plotting most pertinaciously with demagogues for their destruction And, we sorrowingly acknowledge the disadvantages of Protestantism in its contests with Romanism, arising out of its external differences, for they have long since grown into disunions, and denominational selfishness, which did, and do prove most fatal to the cause of truth and our own peace, inasmuch as they weaken the confidence of the weak-minded in the soundness of our faith, and extort from each denomination an indirect avowal of its impotency against the common enemy in the fact that our missionary efforts are directed to the most distant heathen and Mohamedan countries, as if afraid to look popery in the face, while Rome assails us in the very heart of our strength and life.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.7

But what can prevent the further increase of the Romish church, and the final establishment of her supremacy on the ruins of christianity, and the independence of nations? The hopeful may look for some contingency; the pious to God’s mercy; but none in his sober senses to any, or all, the protestant agencies at present in operation; for if all the institutions in this country and Europe for the spreading of true religion have not, in spite of their zeal and money, hindered in any sensible degree the growth of popery under their very eyes, would it uot be folly to suppose that they may put her down, or even arrest her march, when in her full strength, and in the confidence of a crowning victory?HST January 29, 1845, page 198.8

Letter from Liverpool

JVHe

Dear Brother Himes:—I write to inform you that we have heard of the evil treatment you have received by the enemies of the Savior. We desire to sympathise with you, and would very willingly bear a part of the burden; we have been exposed to scoffs and taunts, but these things we must expect; the servant must be as his Lord, and it is through much tribulation we must enter the Kingdom. It appears very extraordinary to me that the time has passed. Surely we cannot have had the correct starting point, else I am persuaded that the Lord would have appeared, I fear that many will now go back and walk no more with us; but I am resolved still to look for and hasten unto the day of God, it is not remote; I am sure of this, that Jesus will not tarry much longer; let us now be watchful and prayerful, lest coming suddenly he find us sleeping; now our faith is to be tried like gold, until every particle of dross be destroyed. O that we may not make shipwreck of faith, and of a good conscience, but persevere unto the end, that we may be saved. I am sure that you are exposed to much persecution; happy are you, for your crown will be the brighter for it. Please give our love to all the dear brethren and sisters.—Brother Dealtry came into town on Saturday fully expecting to find either you or some other brother from America, and is much disappointed; he came here for the express purpose of taking with him back to Bristol any dear brother who might have come. Brother Dealtry has a church in Bristol, and the Lord’s work is prospering among them. We would have been very happy indeed to have received a few lines or a late paper from you; we received the last parcel you were kind enough to send; we do return our sincere thanks to you, and should time continue, we trust that we shall be enabled to give a prooof of our regard; do send us word how you are getting on; we long to hear from you; the brethren send their love to you; may peace be with you all. Amen. Yours affectionately, in the patient waiting for Jesus.HST January 29, 1845, page 198.9

Joseph Curry.
Dec. 2nd, 1844.
Princes place, Fleet Street, Liverpool.

Lettet From Bro. I. Adrian

JVHe

Dear Brother Himes:—You will no doubt be pleased to learn that the Advent brethren in this region are yet firm in the faith that the Lord will soon appear. It is true that those of us who were expecting the return of our Lord on the 10th day of the 7th month have been greatly disappointed; yet we are not discouraged. Christ will come very soon, to the everlasting joy of his waiting people. The Lord permitted us to mistake the last lighthouse for the harbor. We are now in the vicinity of home, and the contrary winds begin to howl around us in persecution, yet on their breeze is borne the sweet perfume of the heavenly country, for which we look. You know, my brethren, we are exorted to hold fast our confidence to the end. Oh let us not slacken our efforts, but go forward in the strength of the Lord. I am sorry I have been doing so little for the cause in the circulation of the Herald. I wish, my brethren, you all felt as I do at this time. My brethren, God is in this work; soon, very soon, he will take the battle into his own hands, and he will bind satan and all his angels. What we do must be done quickly; behold the Judge standeth at the door. Happy will that servant be whom his Lord when he cometh shall find sighing over the abominations in the land. Let us be faithful and keep in mind the promise, “he that over-cometh shall inherit all things.” It is true, my brethren, that the wise man says “a good name is rather to be chosen than great riches;” yet one wiser than he “made himself of no reputation.” And it is reported of them of whom the world was not worthy, that they “endured trials of cruel mockings.” And Paul took pleasure in reproaches for Christ’s sake. Is it not evident that a popularity-seeking, a self-seeking Christian, must be a contradiction in terms?HST January 29, 1845, page 198.10

Again, what a thought is that; “he made himself of no reputation.” He, whose name shone above the brightest seraph that surrounds the throne of the eternal God, “made himself of no reputation;” and it was said to him “thou hast a devil.” If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more they of the house-hold. Be patient, brethren, our deliverance is at hand. I wish to say for your encouragement, Bro. Himes, [continued after lyrics]HST January 29, 1845, page 198.11

42 The Bridegroom and Bride. MILLENNIAL HARP. 43

JVHe

Bridegroom

1. “I have come to my garden, bride,
I’ve gather’d my myrrh;
I have eaten my honeycomb,
Oh do not defer;
Open now to me;
I’ll come in and sup with thee,
Thou shalt glory see,
Forevermore.”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.1

Bride

2 “I sleep, but my heart awakes,
It is thy glad voice!
Thy fair locks wet with dews of night,
How can I rejoice!
Knocking now for me,
My beloved! lo, ‘tis he!
I shall glory see,
Forevermore!”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.2

3 “I arose to my well-belov’d,
But he had withdrawn!
I fainted in sorrowing,
For my Lord was gone!
I call’d him by name,
To my cry no answer came;
Still I’ll seek the same,
Mourning and lone!”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.3

4 “Whither now has my loved-one gone?
Oh where turned aside?
I am waiting for him alone,
With him would abide!
My belov’d is there,
Midst the fragrant lilies, fair;
I shall Eden share,
Faithfully tried!”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.4

Bridegroom to the Bride when made ready

5 “Thou art comely and fair my love,
Oh, beauty is thine!
I have chosen thee, now my love,
I claim thee as mine!
Thou hast overcome,
For thine eyes were turned to me;
Thou hast victory,
Glory is thine!”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.5

Angels

6 “Who is this that looketh forth
As the morning dawn?
More fair than the queen of night,
And clear as the sun!
Banners in array,
Waving terror and dismay,
In the army’s way
Conquests are won!HST January 29, 1845, page 199.6

7 “Oh who is this that cometh now
From the wilderness?
She leans on her well-belov’d,
In her bridal dress!
Coronation morn!
Jesus comes to claim his own,
He will his adorn,
Robe and enthrone! e. c. cHST January 29, 1845, page 199.7

and of all the brethren who have been in the front of the battle, and borne the burden of the day, that the brethren in the north of Vermont and New York, in the vicinity of Champlain, are holding on to the hope of the gospel. I have never seen them more firm in the faith then they now are. They are becoming more and more satisfied that the mass of the sects have lost sight of the hope of the gospel, in opposing his immediate coming. Almost universal harmony pervades our ranks. Some few of our brethren and sisters have gone off in one of the whirlwinds of these last days; yet we thank God they are but few. There are some pretended teachers walking up and down in the land like their old masters, seeking to lead captive the simple, teaching the propriety of having spiritual wives, etc They make great pretentions to piety!! Look out for them. Sometimes they have on the robe of spiritual redemption or the restoration of the gifts as a shield, or cloak, and so accomplish their ends. In the name of the brethren, having consulted with many of them, I enter my protest against this last effort of the devil to ruin souls. It is a time of great trial; we shall soon hear the last cry, “give us of your oil, our lamps are going out.” We occupy a fearful point, my brethren. Watch. Yours in the expectation of soon seeing Christ. My Post Office address is Essex Vt. J. Adrian.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.8

St. Albans, Dec. 19th, 1844.

Letter from Bro. Barlow

JVHe

Dear Brother Himes:—In the Herald of Dec. 25th, is an article from Professor Bush on the image seen in the dream of Nebuchadnezzar. I wish to notice what appears to me a wide discrepancy between the prediction of the Prophet, and the exposition of Professor Bush.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.9

After admitting that the Image symbolizes the Babylonian, the Medo-Persian, the Grecian, and the Roman empires, he proceeds to say in his 5th, section—“The relation of the smiting stone upon the image, denotes a gradual and not a sudden overthrow of the empires, thus prophetically doomed to destruction. The process of demolition commenced at the ushering in of Christianity, during the reign of the earlier Roman emperors—and is still going on among the prominent nations of modern Europe,” etc. Now, according to Professor Bush, the stone smote the image on the legs; but instead of the image being then broken to pieces, he represents the smiting operation to be continued down to the very toes—but for aught that I can see, he allows the entire image to be yet standing. Now mark the representation of the Prophet—He tells the king that the stone smote the image on the feet, “and break them to pieces.” And the conclusion is unavoidable, that when the feel were broken—all the constituent parts of the entire image are broken at the same time. “Then,” when the stone smote the feet, “was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold, broken to pecies together, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floor, and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them.” Though so many ages have rolled away since the head of gold gave place to the “breast and arms of silver,” the gold cannot be broken by the stone till the iron and the clay are broken. Neither can the silver and the brass, which have both given place to the iron and the clay, be smitten by the stone any sooner than the head of gold. Their doom is at one and the same moment, or the prediction of the Prophet fails.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.10

To me there is an absurdity inseparable from the view of Professor Bush—That if “the process of demolition commenced at the ushering in of Christianity,” the stone has been smiting the image for eighteen hundred years, and accomplished just nothing. If he would call the image the symbol of the kingdom of Satan, there would be some force in his exposition. But this he does not presume to do.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.11

Can the Professor point us to a single human government which Christianity has demolished? If not, according to his view, what avails the smiting of the stone? I believe the event contemplated by the Prophet, was not a mere change from one form of human government to another, but an utter annihilation,—a final sweeping away of every form of terrestial government, whether exercised by saints or sinners, and an introduction to the eternal state in the world to come.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.12

There are several other points in the article alluded to, which in my view are at variance with the scriptures of truth, but I forbear to notice them at this time. In conclusion, I am reminded of the declaration of the Apostle, that it is possible to make the word of God of none effect through our tradition. What is to become of the gold, the silver and the brass of by-gone ages,—whether they ever have, or ever can be smitten by the stone, we are not informed. Will some one tell us?HST January 29, 1845, page 199.13

Yours in hope. H. Barlow.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.14

East Barnard, Jan. 1845.HST January 29, 1845, page 199.15

A Fog in London.—There was a remarkable fog in London on the night of Nov. 21, of which the London Times gives the following account:HST January 29, 1845, page 199.16

“During the early part of yesterday, the fog which over-spread the metropolis and its neighborhood, was not very dense—at least a Londoner would not so consider it; but as the evening advanced, the decrease of light became apparently accelerated by a very great increase in the thickness of the atmosphere; and before 5 o’clock, the whole metropolis was overspread by that which without exaggeration may be designated as ‘a thick darkness.’ The streets presented in every quarter appearances of the utmost confusion and alarm. Persons on foot literally groped their way through the mass of smoke and vapor which filled every street, whilst carriages of all descriptions, wagons, omnibusses, and cabs, made their way at a foot’s space, and under circumstances alike dangerous to the parties who guided them, and to those with whom they were every moment coming in contact. In vain were vehicles provided with lamps, and preceded by torches, in vain was the greatest care and caution observed by those who led or drove; accidents became of momentary occurrence, and amidst the shouting of men, the occasional screams of the few women or children who ventured abroad, the glare of the torches, and the active dexterity of thieves, the police found abundant employment, while every one who had a home, and no very pressing business to keep him out of doors, hurried into shelter with as much expedition as the prevailing darkness and confusion would permit.”HST January 29, 1845, page 199.17

Letter from Bro. Wm. Chapin

JVHe

Dear Bro. Himes,—In looking over a late number of Zion’s Herald, I noticed a communication from this place, signed “C. Baker,” in which he says the “desecrating and bewildering doctrines and operations of Millerism are becoming quite powerless among us, except among a very few.” It would seem that Mr. B. would give an impression abroad that “Millerism” in his charge had become quite powerless. I do not know what he means by “desecrating and bewildering doctrines,” unless it is to believe God’s word, be looking for the Lord, etc. Now it may be cheering to the Adventists scattered abroad, to learn that we are still looking for the return of the heavenly Bridegroom. In ‘42 and ‘43 bro. Cox was stationed here, and preached the word faithfully; and also the time, and God abundantly blessed his labors in the awakening and conversion of about one hundred and seventy souls; and many were led to believe the Lord would come in ‘43. But he was soon removed by a “branch of Christ’s disciples,” who had resolved to banish and drive away Millerism with all its modifications;” and a man was sent to take his place who was bitterly opposed to every thing but Methodism. In the spring of ‘44, we were denied the privilege of worshiping in the house where we had formerly held our meetings, after holding a conference meeting about a week, and we repaired to a school-house. About this time a few of us became convinced, by reading br. Stockman’s trial, and the efforts made to put down the doctrine of the Lord’s immediate coming, that the M. E. Church had become an oppressing and persecuting power; and we felt it our duty to come out of her. With the help of a number of the brethren and sisters who did not then leave, and the assistance of the good Lord, we were enabled to sustain meetings on the Sabbath, and two or three evenings in a week, and prayer-meetings in different parts of the town. We had preaching a part of the time from brethen from different places; but none preached the time of the Lord’s coming, and we all went to sleep. But we were awaked at our camp-meeting by the cry of the seventh month; and about the last of September it was believed by most, if not all, that on the tenth day our great High Priest would come out to bless the waiting congregation. Most of the brethren and sisters thought of nothing but getting ready to meet the Lord. We met at different places for a number of days in succession, for prayer, and had a heavenly pentacost season. Some twelve or fifteen souls were converted to God, over one hundred followed their Master into the water, and all went on pleasantly until about the 20th of October, when a mob surrounded the house of br. Brown, where our prayer-meetings were held, and did some damage, and broke up the meeting; but did not destroy our faith. If these are not scoffers of the last days walking after their own lusts, then I know not when to look for them. But the tenth day passed away, we were disappointed, and somewhat cast down, but not destroyed. We are still a happy band of brethren and sisters, about one hundred in number, well united, bound together in love, following no man, fearing no man, loving everybody, and trying to do the whole will of God. that we may enter in through the gates into the city. We have full faith in our expositions of the prophets; and although the vision seems to tarry, we cannot tell why, but mean to wait for it. As we are destitute of preaching most of the time, we cordially unite in asking some of our preaching brethren from the west to spend a little time in visiting and preaching as the Lord may direct. If time continue, may we not see bro. F. G. Brown here? You will find our houses and hearts open to receive you or any one whom the Lord may send. Yours in the blessed hope,HST January 29, 1845, page 200.1

Wm. Chapin.
Orrington, Me. Dec. 30, 1844.

THE ADVENT HERALD

No Authorcode

BOSTON, JANUARY 29, 1845.

Appointments for Canada

JVHe

Arranged by Bro. Hutchinson

Dear Bro. Himes.—I have just received yours of the second instant informing me of your intened visit to Canada. It has filled our hearts with joy. We have arranged the appointmenst as follows:—HST January 29, 1845, page 200.2

February 15th and 16th, Stanstead.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.3

“18th” 19th, Hatley.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.4

“20th” 21st. Melbourne.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.5

“22nd” 23rd, Shefford.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.6

“25th, Outlet.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.7

“26th, Bulton Centre.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.8

“28th, Odell Town.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.9

March 1st, Champlain.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.10

Notice—Friends in the vicinity of Worcester will find a general assortment of our books and papers in the care of D. F. Wetherbee, 211 Main Street, Worcester.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.11

The Post Office address of Bro. T. M. Preble, is East Weare, N. H.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.12

CONFERENCE

JVHe

An Advent Conference will be held, the Lord willing, in North Scituate, R. 1., to commence on the first day of February, and continue over the Sabbath. J. S. White.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.13

North Attleboro’, Jan. 23, 1845.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.14

Conference. The Lord permitting, there will be a S. A. Conference at Portland, Me, commencing Thursday eve, Feb. 6, to continue over the Sabbath; and I will meet the friends in Dover, NH. Tuesday and Wednesday evenings, Feb. 4th and 5th, Jan 21 I, E, Jones,HST January 29, 1845, page 200.15

Granger, O.—The Post Master of this place wishes to take the “Herald,” one No. having a few days since come into his office,—the first one he ever saw. He says “The way Advent believers are ridiculed and belied here, is a disgrace to mankind.” “While reading your paper, my heart was full, and my eyes betrayed their weakness; partly to see how the honest believer is ridiculed, and partly on my own account. I want to be prepared for the coming of my blessed Jesus.”HST January 29, 1845, page 200.16

OBITUARY

JVHe

Died at Derry, N. H. Jan. 7th, Benjamin Franklin, the only son of Jonathan and Betsey C. Hazleton, aged 19. In early life he was taught the principles of religion, and imbibed the fear of the Lord. Being strictly moral in his habits, and amiable and mild in his manners, he secured the good will and kind regard of all that knew him. For one year past he suffered much from habits tending to consumption, of which disease he died. For eight or ten weeks previous to his death, the grace of patience marked his declining life. Benjamin Franklin knew not the joys of religion till a short time before he died. A number of weeks before his death, he uniformally joined with his parents in earnest and importunate prayer, morning and evening. He obtained forgiveness. The Lord answered. He died in peace and in full hope of soon seeing Jesus and sharing in the first resurrection.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.17

His dying testimony was, that he had no religious convictions for two years past but what originated from the Advent doctrine, or the immediate appearing of our Lord.—Communicated.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.18

SECOND ADVENT CONFERENCE

JVHe

The Advent brethren will hold a Conference, if time continue, at the Baptist meeting house in Orwell, about three miles north east of Orwell Village, to commence on Friday, the 7th of Feb. and hold over the Lord’s day. Bro. Miller is expected to be present, and other lecturers, and the brethren generally are invited to attend.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.19

Children’s Exposition of Scripture.—A serious minded little boy of four, was one night kneeling at his mother’s side, and repeating the Lord’s prayer. When he came to the petition, “Give us our daily bread,” he stopped, and looking up to his mother with a countenance beaming with a sweet expression of gratitude, said, “Mother, God doesen’t give us everything all at once, does he? he gives us a little every day. Isn’t God good to give us a little every day!”—S. S. Visitor.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.20

More Trouble in the Episcopal Church.—We find in the Episcopal Recorder, published at Philadeldhia, an article headed “Recent Developements in New York,” in which it is stated that a sort of conspiracy has been discovered amongst some of the members of the General Theological Seminary in that city, the object of which appears to be to render the institution, as far as practicable, subservient to the principles and policy of Rome.—It is said that the association has its common seal, with C. U. (Catholic Unity upon it, its secret meetings, and its correspondence with the Papal authorities in that vicinity.—Mail.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.21

Letters and Receipts to Jan. 25th

JVHe

J Walker $2 pd to end 5; G Cutting $2 pd to end v 6; W C R Roberts by pm $2 pd to end v 9; R Gault by pm $2 pd to end v 7 only; Louisa Ayers by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; Geo W Gregory by pm $1 pd to 214 in v 9; K Cobb $1 pd to 214 in v 9; H Willard $1 75c pd to 159 in v 7; R Sampson 25c pd to 200 in v 9; J Tewksbury by pm $1 pd to 203 in v 9; Mrs Briggs $2 pd to end v 8; J P Ames $ 1 pd to 220 in v 9; J Gilchrist by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; A Beals by pm $1 pd to end v 8; H Phelps by pm $1 pd to end v 8; J B Richardsom by pm $1 pd to end v 8; Miss C Thompson by pm $1 pd to end v 8; Wm Webster jr $1 pd to 220 in v 9; John Towle $1 pd to end v 9; J Barrows by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9, C V Coburn by pm 50c pd to 207 in 9; J O Johnson by pm 50c pd to 207 in v 9; M L Clark by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; John Lindsey by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; A Newton by pm $1 pd to end v 10; W O Lawrence by pm $1 pd to 204 in v 9; J Whitman by pm $1 pd to 217 in v 9; John Curtis by pm $2 pd to end v 9; Samuel Bass by pm $1 pd to end v 8; Francis F Sparks 50c pd to 207 in v 9; H Durkee by pm $1 in addition to amount entered pd to end v 8; E Wentworth jr by pm $1 pd to middle v 10; Elias Smith by pm $1 pd to middle v 9; D Brewster $1 pd to 220 in v 9; E Stutson $1 pd to 220 in v 9; Rev H Stinson by pm $1 pd to 218 in v 9; J S Richards by pm $1 pd to 207 in v 9—Yes, we will; Asa Styles 20c pd to 194 in v 8; L Bartholow by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; E C Drew $1 for “Watch” pd to end v 8; C Benedict. 50c pd to 207 in v 9; H Smith 50c pd to 207 in v 9; E Peck $1 25c pd to 226 in v 10; S D Ostrander $1 pd to middle v 9; J Powley $1 pd to 220 in v 9; W B Wade 50c pd to 191 in v 8; E B Newton $2 44c pd to end v 8; Mrs Catharine Howe $1 pd to end v 8; Thos R Dorrone $1 pd to 220 in v 9; R Haskins $1 pd to 220 in v 9; R Cleveland $1 pd to 203 in v 9; W S Woodcock $1 pd to middle v 9; S Burroughs by pm $1 pd to 207 in v 9; S Robinson by pm $1 pd to 214 in v 9; A B Thayer by pm $1 pd to 220 in v 9; Dea A Thayer by pm $1 pd to end v 9; B Manning $1 pd to 220 in v 9; W S Willey by pm $1 pd to end v 8; J S Blaisdell by pm $1 pd to 207 in v 9; S Palmer by pm $1 pd to end v 8; Thomas Woodward $1 pd to end v 9; C Morrison 50c pd to end v 8; B D Hill $1 pd to end v 7; M Jackson $1 pd to 220 in v 9; P W Plummer $1 pd to middle v 8; S Hurlbut by pm $2 pd end v 9; S Richardson $1 pd to end v 8; Hannah Robins $1 pd to 215 in v 9; D Blood $1 pd to end v 7; S Richardson $1 pd to end v 8.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.22

Wm Miller; pm West Sand Lake; pm North Springfield $1; pm Manchester N H; pm Hampstead N H; pm Lunenberg Ms; W C Page; L Kimball $30; Jonathan Whitman; pm Limerick Me; Deputy pm General; pm North Prospect Me; H Monger; Wm Miller; I H Shipman; pm Napersville Ill; E C Drew $1 for “Watch”; S S Moulton 50c; S W Deland; J V Himes; D Tarbox $2; C W Beckwith $5; T L Tullock; Mrs W C Page money received all right; Isaac Adison; Abigail Mussey, J S White; pm East Greenwich R I; Wm Barker, Henry S Parker; pm Greenville N Y; H Munger; A M Osgood; pm Richland N Y $1; pm New Ipswich N H.HST January 29, 1845, page 200.23

Vol. VIII. No. 24. Boston, Whole No. 194

Vol. VIII. No. 26. Boston, Whole No.196