Loading...
Larger font
Smaller font
Copy
Print
Contents

The Conditionalist Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 2

 - Contents
  • Results
  • Related
  • Featured
No results found for: "".
  • Weighted Relevancy
  • Content Sequence
  • Relevancy
  • Earliest First
  • Latest First
    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents

    IV. Leading Medieval Rabbis Maintain Final Extinction of Wicked

    Turning again to Jewry, we find that some of the greatest lights of the rabbinical succession, spread over the medieval period, denied the indefeasible immortality of all souls, holding that immortality is limited to the righteous only. And they similarly denied the eternal torment of the incorrigibly wicked, believing in their ultimate exclusion from life eternal, and holding that the most dreadful of all punishments is final extinction and deprivation of being.CFF2 21.3

    Most conspicuous among these was MOSES MAIMONIDES, or MOSES BEN MAIMON (1131-1204), greatest of the medieval Jewish rabbis. Born in Cordova, Spain, conspicuous for learning and ability, and master of the intricacies of Jewish theology, he was called the “Eagle of the Doctors,” a second Moses. He was skilled in medicine and astronomy as well, was adept in Christian philosophy, and had a special fondness for Aristotle—which is significant. He was likewise versed in the lore of antiquity, and was the star pupil of Averroes, 1414) See page 18. whom he greatly admired—another significant relationship.CFF2 21.4

    Picture 2: Maimonides, Abravanel, Manasseh
    Left: Maimonides (d. 1204), Greatest of Medieval Rabbis teaches Complete Excision of Wicked.
    Center: Abravanel (d. 1508), Statesman Theologian of Spain Second Death Is Annihilation.
    Right: Manasseh (d. 1657), Rabbi of Amsterdam Wicked Souls Cut Off.
    Page 22
    CFF2 22

    After the Mohammedan invasion, Maimonides wandered furtively through Spain, Palestine, and Northern Africa, at times having to conceal his religious identity. He finally settled in Egypt in 1165, and there became court physician to the reigning sultan, as well as serving as Chief Rabbi of Egypt. Maimonides was called “The Second Lawgiver,” and there was a saying that “from Moses [the lawgiver] to Moses [Maimonides] there was none such as Moses.” He is also to be remembered for his calendar reforms.CFF2 22.1

    Maimonides established a school in Fostat (Old Cairo), and made a profound and lasting impression upon all Jewry. He established the right of free investigation, and stood out against the contention of an absolute rabbinical authority. He was the author of numerous works, and his Guide to the Perplexed (in Hebrew, Moreh Nebuchim) was undoubtedly his leading production. In this he sought to harmonize rabbinical teaching with philosophy, particularly of the Aristotelian school. Another treatise was Repetition of the Law (in Hebrew, Mishneh Torah), a systematic exposition of the Pentateuch, dealing with the main principles of the beliefs and ethics of the Jews. 1515) Abbot, op. cit., nos. 1931, 1931a.CFF2 22.2

    He was the first to condense the dogmatic tenets of Judaism into Thirteen Articles of Faith—a confession of faith which occupies a position in Jewry similar to that of the Apostles’ Creed in Christendom. Every loyal Jew was expected to repeat it daily, and he who called into question any one of the Thirteen Articles would come under the penalty of excommunication, and would lose all share in the life (world) to come. Maimonides therefore spoke with unequaled authority.CFF2 23.1

    1. MAIMONIDES TEACHES COMPLETE “EXCISION” OF WICKED

    Maimonides taught that immortality is for the righteous only, with ultimate destruction for the wicked. He believed that the material world is to be destroyed, with the wicked involved in that utter destruction and ending in final deprivation of being. Those unworthy of life would not live forever, but would be “cut off” and “perish,” and the soul would ultimately be extinguished.CFF2 23.2

    The worst of all punishments, Maimonides held, is Kareth, which means “excision,” or complete destruction. 1616) F. W. Farrar, Eternal Hope, p 212. It is a death from which there is no return, a ruin which admits of no reparation. Evil men are to be destroyed body, soul, and spirit. 1717) Farrar believes that Maimonides derived his view from the famous passage in the Talmud (Rosh Hashanah 17) which states “that after twelve months of expiation, the bodies of the wicked cease to exist, their soul is burned, and a wind scatters these cinders under the feet of the just.”—Ibid. On the contrary, some rabbis, such as Saadia ben Joseph (d. 942), of Sura, Babylonia, had believed in the eternity of hell torments. And there was marked opposition to Maimonides by such.CFF2 23.3

    He was, in fact, denounced as a rationalist by the traditionalists of his day, who held that the commands of God did not have their foundation in reason, but were of purely arbitrary authority. To offer a reason for any divine command was, by such, considered impertinent and impious. The opposition was most violent in France and in parts of Spain. Some of the leaders of the synagogues in France interdicted Maimonides and burned his books because, among other charges, he opposed the concept of the eternal torment of the wicked. But his position and his influence in general remained unimpeached.CFF2 23.4

    Here are Maimonides’ exact words on the fate of the wicked:
    “The punishment which awaits the wicked man is that he will have no part in eternal life, but will die, and be utterly destroyed. He will not live for ever, but for his sins will be cut off, and perish like a brute. It is a death from which there is no return.” “The reward of the righteous will consist in this, that they will be at bliss and exist in everlasting beatitude; while the retribution of the wicked will be to be deprived of that future life and to be cut off.” 1818) Yad Hachazakah Hilchoth Teshubah, or De Paeniteutia iii. 12; 8:2 (the Latin version appears in Dr. Clavering’s Oxford edition), quoted in Edward White, Life in Christ, p. 222. See also Louis Finkelstein, “The Jewish Doctrine of Human Immortality,” Harvard Divinity School Bulletin (vol. XLII, no. 7), March 30, 1945, pp. 31-34.
    CFF2 24.1

    2. NACHMANIDES ALSO TAUGHT EXCISION OF SOUL

    Some of the most learned medieval Jewish teachers staunchly defended Maimonides, holding with him that the most dreadful of all punishments, assigned to the blackest criminals and the damned, is final extinction and deprivation of being. He was first defended by his friend the noted commentator Nachmanides, 1919) NACHMANIDES, or MOSES BEN NAHMAN (1195-1270), of Spain, practicing physician, as well as rabbi, was a conservative with unbounded respect for Moses and the prophets. He fought the rationalization of the Scriptures. He engaged in a dramatic debate with the Dominican Fra Pablo (a renegade Jew by the name of Paulus Christians) before King James I of Aragon, on the differences between Jews and Christians—winning the disputation. (L. E. Froom, Prophetic Faith of Our Fathers, vol. 2, pp, 215-217.) who held the same view, and who prepared a lengthy letter vindicating Mainionides from the charge of heresy. He reiterated the opinion that after a stated period of torment the wicked suffer the punishment of “excision,” and perish at last into nothingness. He likewise calls it the “third excision, ‘still more severe, by which the body is cut off in this life, and the soul in the life to come.’” 2020) Quoted in Hudson, op. cit., p. 341; see also Edward White, op. cit., p. 223; Edward Pocock, Porta Mosis, vol. 1, chap. 6. To this DAVID KIMCHI (1160-1232), of France, also agreed.CFF2 24.2

    3. ABRAVANEL’S SECOND DEATH IS ANNIHILATION

    The next outspoken defender of Maimonides was DON ISAAC BEN JUDAH ABRAVANEL, or Abarbanel (1437-1508), illustrious Jewish statesman-theologian of Spain, master of the learning of his time, and a financial genius. He was minister of finance under Ferdinand and Isabella from 1484 to 1492. It was he who advanced the funds for Christopher Columbus’ voyages. Living in an age of discovery and of social and religious ferment, he was not only a Biblical scholar but also a remarkable expositor of the prophecies of Daniel 2 and 7—the sequence of the four world powers (Babylonia, Medo-Persia, Grecia, and Rome), with the Little Horn as the “rule of the pope,” or papal antichrist, and the prophetic time periods on the yearday principle. 2121) See Froom, op. cit., vol. 2, pp 223-232, for full documentation. Abravanel likewise held that the soul would be punished in Gehenna, but only for a time, proportionate to the extent of its faults, and that final annihilation constitutes the “second death.” 2222) Miphalot Elohim viii. 6; cf. Rosh Amanah (The Head [Chief Articles] of Faith); see Abbot,. cit. no. 1944. (Pictured on page 22.)CFF2 24.3

    4. MANASSEH: WICKED SOULS CUT OFF

    Still another and later defender of Maimonides was the distinguished MANASSEH BEN ISRAEL (1604-1657), linguist, writer, publisher, and statesman, who was also rabbi of the Jewish congregation at Amsterdam. He petitioned Oliver Cromwell for the return of the Jews to England, after their long banishment. He too was a remarkable expositor of the prophecies of Daniel, and likewise of chapters two and seven, his treatise being illustrated by Rembrandt, who lettered the names of the four world kingdoms of Babylonia, Medo-Persia, Grecia, and Rome on the symbols portraying the great powers of prophecy. 2323) See Froom, op. cit., vol. 2, pp. 232-238, for full documentation. Manasseh contended that Maimonides, learned in all the lore of Jewish antiquity, “understood the cutting off of the soul mentioned in the Scripture to be none other than its annihilation. 2424) In Sepher Nishmath Chayyim (“Book of the Breath of Life”); quoted in Edward White, op. cit. p. 222.CFF2 25.1

    Thus it was that the position of total destruction for the incorrigibly wicked—final extinction and deprivation of being—was maintained by some of the greatest spokesmen of medieval Jewry, 2525) Cf. Pocock, op. cit.; John Allen, Modern Judaism, chaps. 9; 11 Hudson, op. cit., pp. 340, 341; Edward White, op. cit., pp. 221-223; Petavel, op. cit., pp. 109, 110. than whom there were no higher or more learned authorities in Semitic circles. So there was kinship of belief on this point between certain Jewish, Arabian, and Christian teachers of the Middle Ages.CFF2 25.2

    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents