Loading...
Larger font
Smaller font
Copy
Print
Contents

Here and Hereafter

 - Contents
  • Results
  • Related
  • Featured
No results found for: "".
  • Weighted Relevancy
  • Content Sequence
  • Relevancy
  • Earliest First
  • Latest First
    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents

    7. — A SPIRIT HATH NOT FLESH AND BONES

    There are a few other texts which contain the word “spirit,” an explanation of which may be properly introduced at this point:—HHMLD 101.1

    Luke 24:39: “Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.” These are the words of Christ as on one occasion he met with his disciples after his resurrection; and as he then possessed a spiritual body which is given by the resurrection, it is claimed that his words prove the existence of spirits utterly disembodied, in the popular sense. But we inquire, What did the disciples suppose they saw? — Verse 37 states: “They supposed they had seen a spirit;” and on this verse Greenfield puts in the margin the word phantasma instead of pneuma, and marks it as a reading adopted by Griesbach. They supposed they had seen a phantom, apparition, specter. This exactly corresponds with their action when, on another occasion, Christ came to them walking on the sea (Matthew 14:26; Mark 6:49), and they were affrighted and cried out, supposing it was a “spirit,” where the Greek uses “phantom” in both quotations. The Bible nowhere countenances the idea the imagination and superstition of the human mind have ever been prolific in such conceptions. The disciples were of course familiar with the popular notions on this question; and when the Saviour suddenly appeared in their midst, coming in without lifting the latch, or making any visible opening, as spiritual bodies are able to do, their first idea was the superstitious one of an apparition or specter, and they were affrighted.HHMLD 101.2

    Now when Jesus, to allay their fears, told them that a spirit had not flesh and bones as he had, he evidently used the word “spirit” in the sense of the idea which they then had in their minds; namely, that of a phantom; and though the word pneuma is used, which in its very great variety of meanings may be employed, perhaps, to express such a conception, we are not to understand that the word cannot be used to describe bodies like that which Christ then possessed. He was not such a spirit as they supposed; for a pneuma, such as they then conceived of in the sense of a phantom, had not flesh and bones as he had. Bloomfield, on verse 37, says:—HHMLD 101.3

    “It may be added that our Lord meant not to countenance those notions, but to show his hearers that, according to their own notions of spirits, he was not one.”HHMLD 102.1

    Larger font
    Smaller font
    Copy
    Print
    Contents